61
submitted 10 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

No company had to go public. It’s just legalized gambling, but with dire impact on global economies.

I don’t have the answers to all of your questions, but that doesn’t mean I’m wrong.

[-] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

It doesn't mean you're wrong, but it does change the way you fight it, Tson Feir. Innocent companies are trapped in the system you are trying to free them from, and you are opting for the financial equivalent of an Israeli air strike. For somebody who doesn't want a dire impact on global economies, you sure seem to condone actions that will have a dire impact on global economies.

The stock market is not totally random. The value of stock is tied to the value of companies decently well, Gamestop-style fucketry notwithstanding.

My main problem with the stock market isn't that it doesn't work, or it's too random. It is working as intended. The problem with it is that it allows control over a company to be bought and sold without the consent of the company's employees. It is not slavery, because the employees can look for a job at another company if they don't like the new owners. But, like, it's also not not slavery. Disreputable people with, in their opinion, not enough money (cough cough Twitter), can sell their workers to other disreputable people with too much money (cough cough Musk). This is capitalism—its very definition. And it's becoming a real problem.

Sensible countries have already begun putting the brakes on this madness. I believe Germany requires all companies above a certain size to be 40% owned by its employees, and other European countries have similar rules. I think that is a very good compromise. And nobody has to cyanoacrylate themselves to a stock market in order for this to happen.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

It’s all GameStop fuckery. It’s all about profit. I’m not talking about these silly day traders on YouTube but the hundreds of billions of dollars that can shift the economy. It’s disgusting. People get hurt either way.

[-] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

Well, it's all fuckery, but not all of it is of the GameStop variety. You should really read more about what happened with GameStop. Specifically, look for the words "short squeeze".

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

I know about GameStop.

It’s all fuckery. Every bit.

[-] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well, I brought up GameStop because it's an example of the stock market not working as intended. I'm saying the stock market usually works as intended. And it is intended as a means of buying and selling companies, their assets, liabilities, and crucially, their employees.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

I’m sure you did. The stock market is nothing more than legal gambling.

[-] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You're saying it usually does not function properly as a means of buying and selling control over companies? Because Musk bought his first big piece of Twitter on the stock market. That's an example of the stock market working as intended. I would argue that this is how the stock market usually works. This is not gambling. This is the purchase of a tangible asset.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

It does not function to improve the economy.

[-] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 0 points 9 months ago

What do you mean by "improve the economy"?

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

One where the benefits of economic growth are distributed broadly across society, allowing everyone to contribute to and benefit from economic prosperity.

[-] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

You are describing what should be done with a powerful economy. Not how to create a powerful economy. Abolishing the stock market will not encourage wealth distribution. It will make the economy weaker, and could easily make wealth concentration worse.

The right move is to reform the stock market, imposing rules on company ownership. That's why I brought up Germany. All companies in Germany above a certain size must be 40% owned by their employees.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Agree to disagree. But I do like the part about Germany.

[-] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

And I'm sure plenty of companies have regretted going public, and now, they're stuck with it.

this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
61 points (93.0% liked)

World News

39026 readers
1278 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS