145
submitted 9 months ago by kingshrubb@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 96 points 9 months ago

lawmakers are scrambling to help

Sure they are.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.social 18 points 9 months ago

Can't have landlords taking a haircut on rent.

Who did you think they where helping?

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

What doesn't work (but inevitably will be tried):

  • Asking nicely (lol)
  • Subsidising rent (landlords will raise rents to compensate for subsidy)
  • Rent caps and rent control (artificial price ceiling creates shortfall in market, leaving people still without adequate housing or on long waiting lists, or landlords will find bullshit reasons to evict tenants and raise rents)

What does work:

  • Building more fucking housing
[-] stown@sedd.it 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The problem with point 4 is that no developers are going to undertake it unless they can make a significant profit. If the addition of new housing has the potential to lower the ROI where is the insentive to build?

If the government decides that they will be the developer/investor then the whole project is definitely going to lose money because contractors will ALWAYS milk a government project.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

The problem with point 4 is that no developers are going to undertake it unless they can make a significant profit. If the addition of new housing has the potential to lower the ROI where is the insentive to build?

Your assumption is that all builders have infinite flexibility and are exactly the same. The real world companies can't just adjust their staffing and capital equipment based on last hour revenue. There is always someone will to cut into their margins to get a contract.

Imagine you are running one of those companies. You normally make 100k on this type of job, the market is willing to pay 90k. Do you walk or not? If you walk you still have to make payroll this week. Wouldn't it be better to not make as much money as you want but still make money vs not making any money?

Capitalism is a far far from perfect system, but it really exceeds at racing to the bottom. Someone somewhere is willing to do x for less.

[-] stown@sedd.it 2 points 9 months ago

The race to the bottom will work great in underregulated labor markets or anywhere regulations on environmental and safety standards are relaxed. The issue (no problem, because I believe there should be tough regulation) is that there is now a baseline that you can't really go under unless you cut corners somehow.

I've been working in construction in the SF Bay Area for over 15 years.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Right so you can't think of literally anyway you can follow the rules and make more money? I find that surprising given that I have listed one method in my previous comment and my infrastructure employer is constantly finding tricks to bring the costs down

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Public housing is not about profit. It's about giving people affordable shelter.

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago

In the same way as someone at work caught picking their nose for the entire duration of the project with a deadline due for last week.

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
145 points (96.8% liked)

News

23406 readers
3000 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS