-28
Biden Confuses Presidents of Egypt and Mexico During Presser About His ‘Memory’
(www.thedailybeast.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
-28 points (31.1% liked)
politics
19135 readers
1171 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
He didn't 'confuse the Presidents of Egypt and Mexico,' he accidentally referred to Egypt as "Mexico." He was talking about negotiating with Sisi to get the border with Gaza open for humanitarian aid; so he was talking about Egypt's border and he was talking about Egypt's president but he accidentally said "Mexico"; you know, the type of verbal gaff people have been making fun of him about for the last 40+ years.
This is another "Hillary's Emails" smear attempt, except it isn't going to work well when Trump is 3 years younger than Biden and saying much more demented things.
Also he tried to kill his own vice president when he didn't do what Trump wanted, committed multiple rapes, and said he is above the law.
I feel like that kind of thing should get mentioned more often whenever someone starts comparing candidates. It's like that Batman comic where they elected The Joker mayor.
But person, woman, man, camera, TV!!
Holy shit, liberals really are gonna hand the presidency right over to Trump again, aren't they
Do you know of a willing candidate who has a significant chance of beating Trump other than Biden?
Hear that chirping?
The unmistakable sound of crickets.
There may have been one, but the DNC and dark money would never have allowed it.
People keep saying things like this, but it's not like that stopped people like Bernie.
Well I would argue that the DNC did stop Bernie with the desire to get Hillary on the ballot. But getting back to the question; It's a long shot because of the naturalized citizen angle, but Cenk Uygur (known from the TYT podcasts) perhaps would be an interesting choice. A Turkish-born American though, sadly this will disqualify him with the current electoral rules, but at least he's educated, and not over 80, and I know he's fighting to stay in the run despite these hurdles.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Phillips_2024_presidential_campaign
You really think people want Dean Phillips to be president?
Do they like his idea of putting Elonk Musk in his cabinet?
But sure, we definitely need a former CEO and one of the wealthiest men in congress to be president because, as we've learned, wealthy CEOs make the best presidents.
Oh, and if you want someone who is going to be hardline on Israel, it won't be Dean Phillips.. I'm sure his buddies on Fox & Friends are right there with him on that one.
From what I can tell, the "draw" of Phillips is he isn't as old as Biden. Because he sure doesn't sound like a good alternative to me.
I'd say it's less of a question of willingness and more of a question of "will the Democratic establishment tolerate this" thing. There is no discussion about support for Israel for example, and that's just the most glaringly current one. Trump is awful in a lot of other ways, but one of his crimes is acting the radical to Biden's moderate, making Biden and the Dems the only sensible choice.
There is a problem with not being able to vote for people who would represent you, and only being able to vote for someone who is not a literal fascist. The US should be able to do better than one of its leading presidential candidates touting the accomplishment of identifying a whale in a picture book correctly.
In a functioning democracy, there is more than one sane choice.
There is no shortage of people who could be willing to challenge the Democratic establishment. They just aren't doing it. Unless you count Dean Phillips, and I don't.
It's hard to challenge the establishment if it is as established as it is. By the nature of the system, a challenger running on public healthcare or repealing anti-labour union regulations can't come from outside the Dem party, since third party candidates don't go anywhere. But you also can't get anywhere with that inside the party, because you would be a fringe.
The problem is that people don't get to vote on policy, policy shifts depend on internal party dynamics. And that's awfully far from a healthy democracy. Can you vote for prohibiting right-to-work laws in your next election? In mine, I get to say climate change is important to me, or free enterprise, or strong border controls, or a better healthcare system. I get to vote on issues that impact me and are important to me, largely without them being bundled together with stuff I don't like. It's not perfect, but it's not like I get to choose between voting for the interests of corporations versus nazis.
Biden is the worst candidate of the bunch by that metric. His favorability is 17 points underwater right now, and he's losing to Trump in most recent polls by around 4 to 6 points. And keep in mind that that's measuring popular vote, not electoral votes. Hillary won the popular vote by 2 points and still lost the election. Biden needs to lead Trump by at least 3 points to even have a chance, it took a +4.5 margin to win last time around. And while we're comparing to Hillary, her favorability was only 15 points underwater in October after the Comey report.
Cornel West would be a way better choice. Even Dean Phillips would be less bad of a choice (y'know that whole "lesser evil" thing and all that). In polls, a generic Democrat leads Trump by 6 points.
But it's all a moot point because Democrats keep shutting down primaries and removing candidates from the ballot. They're attempting another coronation just like they did in 2016 - why would any candidate try to run when the party leadership is shutting them down?
So you can't actually name a willing candidate who has a significant chance of beating Trump other than Biden. Gotcha.
By the way, you are aware that Cornel West isn't running as a Democrat, right?
Bazinga!
I'm super impressed by your ability to ignore literally everything I wrote.
I read everything you wrote. It ignored what I wrote, which was:
You did not name one. You made a lot of excuses, but you didn't name one. Unless you think Cornell West has a chance of beating Trump. Polls certainly don't suggest so.
People are making this weird fucking arguments like "Biden is so fucking senile he couldn't even immediately drop the years of the Obama presidency" or whatever.
Like what the fuck, I couldn't drop the year of any single thing in my life without thinking about it long and hard, and I'm 30 with no sign of dementia. It's just not how I remember things, and I feel like most people don't.
I'm 46. Last year, I was filling out a form, and I had to ask my wife my age. She had to think about it. We're both the same age.
I don't think we both have dementia.
I can dig it. He’s been beating the drum about the domestic border “crisis” with the republicans for a good while. When pressed about the Gaza border, he slipped with the name of the country.
Who gives a shit. Plenty of people do it every minute of the day.
A certain orange care home candidate has been doing it a lot recently. Sioux City, Orban, Pelosi…just to name a few gaffes.