262
submitted 9 months ago by naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

... wasn't there basically no additional cancer present in mammals over there?

And even in humans - hasn't only thyroid cancer spiked in the months after the accident?

Oh, she claims these wolves are genetically different than others (or that all wolves are better at beating cancer?) ... I don't understand that claim. And if that's true, then why not test DNA/immune system of humans living very near there (The Babushkas of Chernobyl?

[-] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Kyle Hill has some pretty good videos on this topic: https://youtu.be/bmVGwOP_zi8?feature=shared

My understanding is that while the fallout from Chernobyl wasn't very dangerous, and didn't lead to a noticeable increase in cancer rates, the area around the reactor is still very dangerous due to the debris from the reactor core that's scattered around.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/326wzbsmjGk?feature=shared

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
262 points (98.5% liked)

World News

32281 readers
672 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS