129
submitted 1 year ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He paid for it, it's his art to destroy now.
If you don't like that, or think I'm being insensitive, then maybe we shouldn't let rich people buy and hoard art.
If they're culturally or historically important, why are they in a private collection?
Is it sad to see? Yes, absolutely. But not any more sad than it falling into the hands of a private collector in the first place.

[-] youngGoku@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Agreed 100%.

Also Assange is a whistleblower and is in jail for it... Sad.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 year ago

Assange is not really a whistleblower... He's a journalist who published the content whistleblowers gave him

[-] spacedout@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

More like an editor, even. Making the persecution just so much sadder.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
129 points (94.5% liked)

World News

36796 readers
450 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS