150
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by queermunist@lemmy.ml to c/news@lemmy.world

And you all told me the blue maga border bill that Republicans rejected was 4d chess.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

I've always been staunchly against illegal immigration for that reason.We're already in a cost of living crisis. The country is full. I wish the Democrats would realize that by continuing to allow illegal immigration, it lowers the cost of labor, and in turn and crushes the working class' collective bargaining power. I'm not gonna go vote for an insurrectionist traitor that will cut Bezos' tax bill to fix it though, but straight up, idk why people even want to come here anymore. 20 years ago, I get it, but now everything is expensive and you're not going to make it Washing dishes and picking fruit.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

The country is far from full. We have cities in a few states that dwarf the population of entire other states.

The cost of living crisis is manufactured. And we as a society could choose to end it tomorrow.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Agreed, but adding to demand without relieving supply does us no favors. If we banned Air BNB and corporate landlords of single family homes, this problem would be gone tomorrow, but that's not going to happen.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

We could even leave those things untouched. And simply build desirable, affordable public housing like Austria. In areas where it's feasible have Finland style district heating.

That would cause the collapse of said corporate land barons and ridiculous Air BNB BS. We won't do it however. Because there's no short term profits in it for said land barons. And it would reduce how much they're able to overcharge impacting their profits long and short term.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

a vacancy tax would fix seattle overnight, I stayed at a hotel there recently and most the nearby buildings were over 50% just empty rooms. Theres no reason to justify these kinds of rents except price fixing.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

100%. A friend of mine lives in a "luxury apartment" and at night, most of the lights are off, I never see other people in the hallway, and I can almost guarantee it is 30-50 % occupied. They don't care though, they would rather have it be 30% occupied at the higher price than 100% occupied at what the true market rate is.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Reducing demand does no favors either because the cost of living is artificial. Demand is irrelevant.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I mean, it's definitely still relevant. If everyone just said fuck it n moved into Hooverviles tomorrow, cost of housing would go down with no one to occupy/ pay for the housing. They are restricting supply. The only way to combat it beyond asking for legislators to actually do their fucking job is to decrease demand.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They're restricting supply by buying up empty housing and hoarding it (and manipulating zoning laws and buying off city councils and getting the "right" ordinances passed etc). There isn't actually a shortage of housing, just a shortage of "available" housing. You can't fix that by shutting down the border. They'll just hoard even more to compensate.

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
150 points (84.1% liked)

News

23259 readers
1545 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS