754
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Gretchen Whitmer responds to calls by some Democrats to vote ‘uncommitted’ in Michigan’s primary on Tuesday

Gretchen Whitmer, the Michigan governor, pushed back on calls to not vote for Joe Biden over his handling of the Israel-Gaza conflict, saying on Sunday that could help Trump get re-elected.

“It’s important not to lose sight of the fact that any vote that’s not cast for Joe Biden supports a second Trump term,” she said on Sunday during an interview on CNN’s State of the Union. “A second Trump term would be devastating. Not just on fundamental rights, not just on our democracy here at home, but also when it comes to foreign policy. This was a man who promoted a Muslim ban.”

Whitmer, who is a co-chair of Biden’s 2024 campaign, also said she wasn’t sure what to expect when it came to the protest vote.

Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat who is the only Palestinian-American serving in Congress, urged Democrats last week to vote “uncommitted” in Michigan’s 27 February primary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Think of it this way: Vote for Biden. Not because you support any war, because you support being able to harass the man for another four years. Don't let him leaving office leave you with regrets! Meanwhile, consider also voting specifically against tyranny.

Personally, I see a chance for change with Biden, or at least the foundations for positive change. All I see with Trump are giant steps backwards.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Voting for Biden because forcing him to be president is elder abuse, and he deserves it

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago

he a little confused but he got the spirit

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Biden is definitely confused, but he doesn't have the spirit.

He keeps ranting about how he wishes republicans we're more like Nixon, Reagan, and HW Bush...

I know you don't have 50 years of Senate experience, but you understand they weren't great guys with integrity...

Right? You get that right?

Please tell me people under 70 don't think those three were fine now.

I know the Overton window keeps getting dragged right by neoliberals, but have they really convinced people those three had integrity and everything was fine back then?

[-] Soulg@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

They weren't calling Biden confused, they were calling the commenter confused.

Biden may be old but he is clearly perfectly capable of doing the job and will most likely be just as capable again.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Saying Biden is "perfectly capable"...

Have you watched him speak?

Like, he doesn't do it often, and for good reason, but the only way someone can say what you just said without intentionally lying, is if they're ignoring their eyes and ears and believing his staff that as soon as a camera isn't pointed at him, Biden suddenly becomes half his age.

If I link any recent video of Biden acting confused, you're going to claim it's a one time thing. No matter how many videos I link, you'll keep claiming it only happens in every video I link.

So how about this?

Why don't you help me and everyone else feel comfortable with Biden?

Link a single video of him as president speaking for more than 3 minutes without fucking something up?

He's the freaking US President, if you can't find a video 3 minutes long of him not getting confused, maybe that means he is confused all the time, the admin is hiding him, and all their claims of what he's like is bullshit.

Now keep in mind you're not just saying he's "good enough" at 81, you're saying he'll stay "perfectly capable" until 85.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago

Have you watched him speak?

I have, yeah. He has a speech impediment. He's had it his entire life. That's not confusion.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

As someone with an actual speech impediment I've just started blocking people who say a childhood stutter can reappear 60 years later and cause you to mix up names and just go blank, but never actually stutter.

I just can't believe anyone used logic to get there.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago

I can't believe you've never mixed up names, gone blank, or had something re-appear in a high-stress moment of your life.

I cna't believe that you can watch him from 20 years ago, and not see exactly the same kind of verbal gaffes then that he has now. But I guess if you only see what you want to see, then that's on you.

[-] kofe@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

This is the best take I've ever heard tbh

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

This comment has a better shot of anything else to get me to vote for him instead of abstaining the presidential and just voting down ballot. And before anyone flips their shit, I don't live in swing state. My vote literally can not matter less.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I refuse to vote for someone who supports genocide. I'm conflicted about it because it helps Trump, but I simply cannot vote for Biden. Gaza is part of it, but he's broken his promises.

He said he would halt the border wall construction and instead expanded it and had a photo-shoot at the border. He used the same exact loopholes Trump did to deny and turn away asylum seekers at the border.

He said he would make the Saudis a pariah state for chopping up a journalist and then he signs billion dollar arms deals.

He makes a big deal out of Russian war crimes when 3x more civilians have died in a few months in Gaza than the entire 2 years since the war started in Ukraine.

He went and pretended like Navanly was a hero. He met with Navanly's family. The guy who organized and marched with neonazis in Moscow and referred to Muslims as "cockroaches" that needed to be exterminated.

It's such a ridiculous level of hypocrisy I cannot tolerate.

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

If Biden, who we know is better than Trump and whom the current also genocidal RNC cower behind, loses, what will your opinion of Trump be in four years? This is a big picture situation and I'd rather the chance to fix things with Biden in a second term. He has kept many promises and we have been able to pressure him into certain positions. Vote for Biden now in order to have a chance to fix things later. That or the RNC takes over and the U.S. heavily steps into tyranny and fascism. That's the writing on the wall.

One leaves a bad taste in your mouth.

The other potentially stains your hands.

I do understand your position. I just feel it's a righteous stance at the wrong time.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

i grew up as an illegal immigrant from latin america. trump's comments against latinos (murderers, rapists, etc) and the whole xenophobic border wall thing basically caused me to write him off from the beginning

i will never vote for trump because i can't support a guy who pushes this type of rhetoric (and like you said, that eventually becomes policy. look at roe v wade)

but i also cannot justify voting for biden. if we're being honest, i still haven't 100% decided what i'm gonna do but i'm thinking probably 3rd party unless something dramatically changes between now and november

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Your ability to vote now exists because of people like Biden, even if not specifically him, dunno his entire history. Those who crossed lines to find a way. Had the current Republican party and Trump existed back then in the way they do now you and your family would not be here. That is why this is so important. It isn't about us accepting Biden over someone else, it's that in order to deal with Trump and take out his cronies, we must be willing to step up and work together. Once we get back this hump, we can start on reform. I feel people are finally to that point, we just need a chance to make it real.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

I get it, but a vote is not an endorsement. I didn't want Clinton in office in 2016, and as a direct result of people like me not voting Clinton, the supreme court has been stacked conservative, and will remain so for potentially decades. We need to vote based on what the best possible outcome will be, not what outcome we wish was possible.

this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
754 points (94.6% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS