view the rest of the comments
news
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
I am not aware of any literature in English. I have been piecing together information from articles in Chinese to write a story about it, but haven’t finished yet.
The quick rundown is this:
In the summer of 1974, a 12-member team of plant scientists from USDA visited China on an expeditionary field trip to study the rural development program in China and as an exchange program with Chinese agricultural scientists. This was a trip of goodwill gesture that took place merely 2 years after the historic Nixon-Mao meeting to normalize the relations between both countries.
Among the team was Richard L Bernard, a soybean breeder from the US Regional Soybean Laboratory in Urbana, IL., who had traveled across several provinces to study and collect wild soybean plants, first in Jilin, then Shenyang, then Nanjing and Shanghai. This detail will become important later on.
The American scientists left China spending a month there, and compiled their findings into a report titled The Rural Development System of the People’s Republic of China: Impressions and Questions. (Note: evidence of Bernard’s participation in the report).
Nothing seemed unusual, both sides bid their farewells and went their own ways. It is now widely believed that this innocuous trip laid the foundation for the weaponization of food imperialism against China decades later.
Time jump 20 years to 1995. Monsanto launched the world’s first commercial GMO soybean product: the Roundup Ready soybean line that conferred superior yield, growth and extreme resistance to pesticides. The seeds would make their ways into Brazil and Argentina in 1996, then in the late 1990s, Monsanto would distribute the seeds for free to Chinese farmers amidst economic stagnation (the PRC was undergoing its first economic crisis in 1995-96 at the time), who were desperate to make up their losses.
The uneducated Chinese farmers ceded away their legal rights when they were coaxed into signing Monsanto’s Roundup Ready Technology Agreement, among which included that the farmer must pay ”120 times the technology fee plus the legal fees if s/he is caught violating the agreement.” (GRAIN)
Unaware of the implications, and as the GMO seeds would soon dominate the world’s soybean production, reaching a global average of 80% being GMO soybean, China increasingly relied on importing foreign GMO soybean seeds and especially after joining the WTO in 2001, the relaxation of trade regulations further exacerbated the reliance on foreign seeds.
In 1999, Monsanto would file a patent in 81 countries claiming intellectual property rights on soybeans with an enhanced yield (WO0018963). This patent would give Monsanto the “monopoly rights on Glycine soja (wild soybean), in particular the PI407305 strain from southern China and all its progeny. Further, the patent extends to any soybean carrying the yield genes.” (GRAIN) (i.e., any genetically modified progeny based on the parental Chinese soybean strain is now an intellectual property of Monsanto)
Then, in April 2000, the monopoly rights would be extended to 101 countries, including China.
What’s the problem here? Well, China did not even realize that Monsanto had filed a patent claiming copyrights on Chinese wild soybean strain, and was only made aware of the fact when contacted by a German Greenpeace activist.
Investigative work done by Chinese activists and law students would eventually uncover that the Monsanto’s soybean sample very likely came from the USDA repository, and the only information available about the sample was that it was collected near Shanghai. There was no official record of such exchange ever taking place, and it is widely believed that it came from among the samples smuggled by Bernard during his field trips to several Chinese provinces more than 20 years ago.
Now that China has lost its soybean rights to a multinational corporation, it’s time to destroy the Chinese agricultural sector once and for all.
In August 2003, bad weather and pests caused the soybean production in Midwestern America to fall, prompting the USDA to reduce its soybean inventory to a 20-year low. As soybean is a staple food product in China, many food processing companies panic bought the soybeans, causing the price to spike between August 2003 and April 2004, and the soybean futures under Chicago Board of Trade went from $540 in August 2003 to $1060 in April 2004, a 30-year high (the producer price in China spiked from 2300 yuan/ton to 4400 yuan/ton).
By April 2004, as the price reached its peak, USDA reversed its position and increased soybean inventory, and flooded the global commodity market with soybeans again and causing the price to plunge. As many of the Chinese food processing companies had purchased the higher priced soybeans months before, the sudden plunge in soybean price resulted in a huge loss for those companies. 70% of them went insolvent.
Agricultural giants ADM, Bunge, Cargill and Louis Dreyfus finally took the opportunity and bought nearly 80% of China’s food processing industries that were going under. The rest is history. The foreign corporations have gained near total control of China’s agricultural sector.
China should get to nationalize the soy bean industry as a treat.
Though, realistically, I think that China believes that American capitalists have enough lobbying power in Washington that the threat of nationalization is more powerful than the actual results of nationalization.
Only time will tell, I suppose.
The problem is the GMO seeds. You need an alternative that provides a similar or even superior yield, otherwise the production level will fall and you still run into food shortage problem.
The key benefits of genetically modified seeds is that they grow extremely well and require much less treatments like fertilizers, and as such is very cost effective. This is how flooding a country with GMO seeds can easily displace the other domestic strains, since farmers that have adopted the GMO products will easily out-compete farmers that don’t, even if you take governmental regulations into account that favor domestic strains, especially when you have over a billion people to feed.
The only region that I know of that has banned GMO crops and produce soybeans from domestic strains is Heilongjiang. Yield is obviously lower but it retains a certain level of agricultural sovereignty.
China has also been doing its own R&D into rice, soybeans etc. (while avoiding existing patents claimed by foreign corporations) and there have been some results, but to commercialize them on a large scale will take time.
GMO crops are very good environmentally though, I wonder what it would take for china to just steal the secret sauce and produce it locally, and wouldnt be surprised if they have a stash already
Those seeds are also the "property" of Monsanto. If I understand it all correctly, farmers have to buy new seeds every year. Theoretically, if China nationalized its entire agricultural economy and subsidized the or industrialized the process of harvesting enough seeds for the next year, like really took extreme measures to ensure agricultural sovereignty then maybe in some number of years and likely economic tragedies if not famines, they could stabilize production. But if they start harvesting seeds, Monsanto will consider it a violation of their patent rights, stop selling China seeds and the industry will get crushed by the competitive forces of capitalism. Basically there's no way to change without incurring expenses that would tank the industry and even if the state stepped in to take drastic corrective measures they likely wouldn't be able to stave off dire consequences.
huh, finally doing something useful
Wow, thanks so much for taking the time to write all of this up and working to put together the story!
That really is a wild story. I’m going to China tomorrow, is there anything I could do while I’m there to help your story?