121

We've all heard the liberal argument "if there is a candidate only 99% as bad then you're morally obligated to vote for 99% Hitler." But when we extend that logic to a nearly identical scenario it suddenly sounds a lot less compelling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 29 points 6 months ago

Krakkkers: "Oh great two Hitlers"

[-] Dessa@hexbear.net 17 points 6 months ago

The true gender binary

[-] i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 months ago

In any good system, there is more than two choices.

[-] edge@hexbear.net 25 points 6 months ago

You can’t vote third-Hitler! If you don’t vote for regular Hitler then worse Hitler will win!

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 21 points 6 months ago

I'm losing track of all the Hitlers smh

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 16 points 6 months ago

There's 101% Hitler, Normal Hitler, Mecha Hitler, and Hitler Jr

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 13 points 6 months ago
[-] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 5 points 6 months ago

God, I hated my class on Hitler Particle physics. I don't care about how Hitler Quark Jets result from Strong Hitler interactions. Just annihilate them all with anti-Hitlers and be done with it.

[-] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 20 points 6 months ago

102% Hitler runs a spoiler campaign against 100% Hitler so that 101% Hitler wins. 100% Hitler blames 99% Hitler anyway.

this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
121 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13447 readers
822 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS