108
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 19 points 7 months ago

our culture

it's just capitalists, man. anyone paying slightly more attention than average understands that sequel/reboot/franchise/cinematic multiverse stuff sucks and isn't actually capable of being a cultural touchstone.

[-] axont@hexbear.net 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's shareholders looking at a chart of AI extracted keywords that describe a movie and then comparing them to scripts with the same keywords. They only want to fund movies that have the same or greater return as previous films with the same basic descriptions or market awareness.

That was less of the case in between the 60s and 80s because:

  • lack of comprehensive market data
  • belief that audiences respond primarily to actors they recognize rather than plots or IP
  • movies didn't have to appeal to broad international markets and could be about very specific themes (this is supposedly why comedy movies are less common)
  • movies were less expensive to make and had less complications to get funding
  • Movie producers were all high on cocaine and barbiturates 110% of the time and threw money around at random
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
108 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
810 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS