[-] axont@hexbear.net 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What is going on? Why are demons attacking in my sleep and why are they making me gay? The Democratic party is sending gay demons to snuggle with you and satitate your scratching kink

confusion

[-] axont@hexbear.net 72 points 1 day ago

Greta Thunberg isn't even an American lol

[-] axont@hexbear.net 42 points 2 days ago

Liberals rehabilitating the Bush administration means in 10 years they will absolutely rehabilitate Trump

[-] axont@hexbear.net 45 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Zines, pamphlets, polisci journals, and angry letters sent from a 7 person org named like People's Communist Restoration Movement to another org with an identical name and 9 members fighting over a bookstore in Seattle

[-] axont@hexbear.net 16 points 3 days ago

The dark cowboy rides again

[-] axont@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago
[-] axont@hexbear.net 23 points 4 days ago

AOC comes out in defense of the being gay with your dad constituency

[-] axont@hexbear.net 8 points 6 days ago

You just made me realize the white coded characters speak in British or American accents, whereas the non-white characters speak in French accents.

I've never thought about this before and I have no idea if it was even intentional

[-] axont@hexbear.net 57 points 6 days ago

The only way this liberal logic works is if you assume leftists owe a vote to Democrats by default, so not voting for the Democrats means they've lost your vote that they rightfully owned in the first place. It's so goofy. No one is losing anything if I never intended to vote for genocide. If liberals can't come up with a good reason for me to vote for their particular Hitler, that's on them, not me.

[-] axont@hexbear.net 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Peterson is doing the exact sort of postmodernism he rallies against, isn't he? He always does this, he circled around something that almost had a point, that has a tinge of reality to it, but he swirls around in desultoey psuedo-philosphy jargon so that he never has to be pinned down as saying one thing or another.

Actual philosophers will define and redefine their terms, especially if they know they're using the terms in ways that aren't standard. Like Delueze/Guattari make it explicitly clear that rhizomatic and arborescent are not botanical terms and aren't referring to literal trees, even though they're borrowing biological terms. Foucault uses the term archaeology in a non-standard way too, but he knows he's doing that.

I haven't watched this whole thing and I probably won't, but it sounds like Peterson just wants to say that the immaterial is a real thing, that meta-analysis refers to genuine Platonic forms in the ether. Otherwise what is he even saying. He's saying dragon is a shorthand for "threat" and that biology is something like "human capacity." So he's almost got a point in that the conception of a dragon is biological in the sense that human biology has cooked up the concept of a dragon out of various threatening features to us as humans. It's a big monster made of the things that would kill us, and our conception of what kills us is informed by our biology and surroundings. Different cultures have had different ideas of monsters that had to do with animals they found threatening. But he's shouting over how the other two aren't accepting his exact terminology, even though he's failing to define his terms?

You could probably do a cool analysis on how early myths/legends had a lot of fierce beasts who attack humans, but now more of our monster ideas are more human-shaped. Like back then you had monsters like trolls or minotaurs, but now monsters are like zombies and vampires. You could make a cool point about how our more primal fears have become more like fears relating to our class and social position, like zombies representing mass unrest or vampires being upper class bloodsuckers.

Hey look I explained how one could talk about dragons in biological terms without shouting at Richard Dawkins or looking like my brain got scrambled on benzos

52
submitted 7 months ago by axont@hexbear.net to c/vegan@hexbear.net

I got told today I shouldn't raise kids because I'd purposefully raise them in a vegan household, without animal products of any sort. I was told this would be dangerous and unfair to the kids.

It was a weirdly direct thing for this person to say to me (one of my coworkers). It's stuck in my head. I was told I should let my potential children choose what sort of morals they have, even though this person is raising their kids Catholic. Their advice to me was to allow my potential kids to choose every night between a meat-based meal and a vegan meal (???). And several other coworkers agreed. Where do they come up with this? No carnist raises their kids like this.

So is anyone raising vegan kids or does anyone know about what it's like? Or was anyone here raised in a vegan household?

14
submitted 8 months ago by axont@hexbear.net to c/vegan@hexbear.net

Person the other week noticed I was wearing vegan Doc Martens (the tags are white for vegan shoes). I know they're polyurethane, which isn't great, but I'd prefer that over animal skin on my feet. This person was apparently also a vegan, but says they prefer wearing leather (what) because in their words "Animal leather is biodegradable, lasts longer, and is a by-product of the already existing meat industry." making the point that animal leather has less of an environmental impact.

I didn't know how to respond at all. I know veganism isn't simply consumption habits but it did make me feel weird. I still don't think anyone should wear leather.

Does anyone have advice? I'm just feeling weird and self-conscious now

[-] axont@hexbear.net 132 points 11 months ago

Oh this has got to be why he's so prissy about the words gusano and cracker. I swear he's convinced half of reddit that cracker is an unspeakable slur

22
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by axont@hexbear.net to c/games@hexbear.net

It looks a little different than it did a few years ago? There's been radio silence since Paradox started over with the new devs. This game has had a really troubled production, I think Paradox has been trying to get it off the ground since 2015. Now it's being done by The Chinese Room, most known for Dear Esther and Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs.

Bloodlines is one of my favorite games of all time, so I'm trying to stay optimistic that the devs also hold it in high regard and will try to make a worthwhile sequel. The gameplay from this new trailer looks a little clunky and weird, but maybe that's ok. VTMB never had great combat in the first place. The dialogue, writing, and vibes are where it's at. Looks like there will be gliding around and parkour stuff? Might be cool.

Anyone looking forward to this game? There's even a release window, Fall of 2024, but this game was supposed to originally release in March of 2020, so don't hold your breath.

[-] axont@hexbear.net 116 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I remember reading that when Utah did their ban on trans athletes in school sports, there was exactly one trans girl playing in a girls' sport in the whole state. Exactly one. Statewide legislature passing laws focused on one person, a child.

All this scrutiny and transphobia is directed at literal children, many of whom might be the only trans athlete out of millions. Transphobia is such a disgusting thing to me, not only because of the chauvinism and bigotry, but because it's just so senseless. Trans people are already rare enough as it is and also one of the most vulnerable populations in regards to poverty, assault, unemployment, etc. I've seen some statistics saying that only around 1,000 people in America initiate HRT per year. That should give an idea of just how rare and vulnerable trans people are. And now there's a senseless cultural panic just to whip up a few more eyeballs on the spectacle?

Death to America

view more: next ›

axont

joined 4 years ago