1195
submitted 7 months ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 380 points 7 months ago

This is 100% the fault of shitty advertisers spamming us with literal scams, malware, and spyware.

[-] pachrist@lemmy.world 195 points 7 months ago

I get that ads pay for a free internet. But that doesn't mean that 60% of my screen needs to be malware to read a local news article.

Until advertisers act in good faith, I block as much as possible.

[-] Zikeji@programming.dev 106 points 7 months ago

Or those scummy click bait ads disguised as related articles? They make my blood boil with how they prey on the vulnerable.

[-] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 7 months ago

That's all Google discover is on my phone... Ai generated articles that are just click bait.

is a new episode of RandomShow airing tonight?

Star Trek 31 confirmed to feature major tng character (from today)

blah.

[-] datavoid@lemmy.ml 30 points 7 months ago

Google is so bad for this, plus the fact that they were the ones who started rewarding clickbait articles.

In my mind though, MSN will never be dethroned from having the shittiest content.

[-] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 5 points 7 months ago

It can't, just check the windows thing which appears as a left sidebar in windows 11 or the edge default homepage

[-] Drusenija@lemmy.world 51 points 7 months ago

I've been seeing clips from Ready Player One recently and this reminded me of the main bad guy's philosophy on advertising in the OASIS.

we estimate we can sell up to 80% of an individual's visual field before inducing seizures

Can't help but feeling there's some parallels there.

[-] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 50 points 7 months ago

Seems unrealistic. In reality, they'd be asking how often the seizures occur and would figure out if the increased ad revenue from going to 90% would offset any potential lawsuits.

[-] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 29 points 7 months ago

Used to be if I found the site of a newspaper I thought I liked, I'd turn off my ad blocker to see how it goes.

I don't even try any more. Again and again and again, every time I turn it off the page gets so cluttered that following the article becomes a chore and takes up so many resources that even scrolling slows to a crawl. Ludicrous nonsense.

[-] damndotcommie@lemmy.basedcount.com 13 points 7 months ago

The cluttered pages with "videos" running all over the place is what frustrates me the most. I go in and disable javascript and see how it goes. Javascript seems to be the herpes of the internet as far as I am concerned.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I recently noticed a feature on iOS to open all new sites in Reader mode. It’s definitely more readable but mixed results when not everything is there

There’s got to be some sort of Accessibility violation here: where’s the EU when you need someone to stand up for consumers rights

[-] Starkstruck@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Fr. I legitimately wouldn't mind just a few banner ads to pay for things, but as per usual, the corpos got too damn greedy. So congrats, now you get no ad viewage from me.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 91 points 7 months ago

Don't forget those annoying floating ads and the tiny X that doesn't actually close the ad

[-] mrgreyeyes@feddit.nl 77 points 7 months ago

And the fucking videos that auto play in the bottom corner with audio. I think the old people that recently found out about internet are trying to turn it into regular TV.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

It’s been years since I would browse the web with sound on.

[-] idunnololz@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

I installed an ad blocker once I started getting unmuted video ads. I would be studying for an exam and suddenly start getting blasted with a super loud ad. This was in like 2015, before Chrome added the speaker icon next to the tab playing sound I had to look through every tab to find the source and mute it.

[-] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Plus they made the whole industry weird and obfuscated like bulk produce or something even though it didn't need weird distribution models and dark unseen players in every corner of every ad bought and seen. Why is it this way? I honestly don't know. How did advertisers willingly make it that way over just paying site owners or 1 aggregator or something... I guess Facebook has kind of become that now

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 10 points 7 months ago

This is 100% the fault of shitty advertisers spamming us with literal scams, malware, and spyware.

And the shitty websites running those ads with just a shrug of their shoulders saying "oops, 3rd party. I can't be expected to control what's on my website."

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Nah. While that obviously sucks, I personally don't like people selling me shit. The ads are designed to occupy as much of my mental space as they can and that's a serious breach of what's most valuable to me.

[-] Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 7 months ago

Tragedy of the commons

this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
1195 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59366 readers
1253 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS