425
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Republican senator, who flew to Mexico as Texas faced deadly cold snap, complains of ‘serious security threats’ to lawmakers

The Texas Republican senator Ted Cruz, who achieved viral infamy in 2021 when he was seen at Houston airport for a flight to Cancún even as his state faced a historic and deadly spell of cold weather, this week moved a step closer to securing police escorts for lawmakers at airports.

Under an amendment to the Federal Aviation Authority Reauthorization bill introduced by Cruz, members of Congress and other prominent officials, and some family and staff members, will be offered security escorts if they are deemed “currently … or previously … the subject of a threat, as determined by such applicable federal protective agency”.

If passed by the House and Senate, the bill will fund the FAA for four years.

But given Cruz’s scrape with viral fame over his flight to Mexico in February 2021 – a trip to join a family vacation he abandoned after one day, admitting his “obvious mistake” as tweets and memes proliferated – the senator faces criticism and mockery over his attempt to secure security guards for future airport trips.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

No it isn't. He's an elected public official. That means he shouldn't hide from the public.

[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

We don't say the same thing about the president, right? At a certain point it would be harmful for the country if politicians were subject to physical intimidation. And while we might have feelings about assholes from other parties, what about people with the same views as us?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Weird how he didn't need this security detail last year. Seems like it only happened when he got publicly criticized.

Most senators do not have a security detail. Ted is afraid of talking to the public unless it's on TV.

[-] ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one 4 points 7 months ago

"Let me wheel out a ridiculous comparison to make my point."

One is a head of state, the other isn't. And this isn't a party issue which you've implied in several comment. Nobody in congress should receive protection unless they are paying out of pocket.

[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

How is it a ridiculous comparison?

I wasn't saying that a senator or congressman is of the same importance as a president. After all, you won't see the president at an airport.

What I'm saying is it's in the public interest for our elected representatives not to be subject to physical threat.

If a senator is eating at a restaurant, and a person or group comes in who they view as a threat, they always have the option to leave. Often there are multiple points of ingress/egress. And they have the option to bring in as much security as they want.

At an airport you can't just leave unless you want to miss your flight. There are by design limited points to come in/out at an airport, and the terminals are usually dead ends so even if you wanted to leave it might not be possible if confronted by a group. And even if a person wanted to bring private security they don't let people in unless you also buy tickets.

[-] ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one 2 points 7 months ago

If you weren't implying some sort of similarity, why bother making the comparison?

If a senator or representative feels threatened, they can call the police or find security, just like the rest of us. Especially in an airport, they are everywhere.

[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I do imply they are similar, I didn't say they were the same.

Do you think that an elected official might have a higher risk of being threatened than a private citizen?

[-] ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one 1 points 7 months ago

He chose to be a senator, if he feels it's unsafe he can find a "safer" profession.

Do you think that an elected official might have a higher risk of being threatened than a private citizen?

No I don't. There are a TON of elected officials that would not benefit from this change, so this isn't so much protecting elected officials as it's Cruz being too much a a fucking man child to handle criticism from the people he's supposed to serve.

[-] RedWeasel@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago

No one said you can't talk to them just because they have security.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Have you ever tried to talk to someone surrounded by security staff?

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
425 points (99.3% liked)

News

23284 readers
1454 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS