420
submitted 8 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] altec@midwest.social 9 points 8 months ago

I mean, it's true. Network-connected devices are inherently a cyber security risk.

[-] kadu@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Yes, which is why that can't be used as an argument against one specific tool.

[-] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

The benefits massively outweigh the risks when it comes to open source ad blockers (lets be honest, we’re all talking about uBO), but limiting your attack surface is a very widely practiced concept in cubersecurity, and there’s no situation where it is totally without merit.

[-] kadu@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Not using a browser extension but loading JavaScript isn't limiting your attack surface

[-] psivchaz@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago

To be fair, I bet some percentage of those that don't use an ad blocker ARE using something like no script and just don't need one as a result.

[-] Kanda@reddthat.com 1 points 8 months ago

Even ones that are air-gapped and get their updates via USB are a risk

this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
420 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
323 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS