391
submitted 1 year ago by TheJims@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

wasn't there some sort of weird Q-Anon conspiracies surrounding the eclipse?

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 64 points 1 year ago

wasn't there some sort of weird Q-Anon conspiracies surrounding {Insert literally anything here}

Yes.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What were they? (About the eclipse.)

[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago
[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

a real opportunity for smugglers and cartels and migrants to come right in.”

Sigh

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Ahh yes, under cover of shade

[-] ours@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Wide open for a handful of minutes.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"While everyone is watching the sun, we'll crouch down and sneak right past them."

[-] mPony@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

evidently their political worldview was heavily influenced by classic vaudevillian antics and screwball cartoons

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And the idea that an eclipse is as dark as being in a cave without a flashlight.

Once in a lifetime opportunity.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

As a GM I would give my players a bonus to stealth during a total eclipse if they wanted to sneak past some guards, so I think this is a very valid take. ;-)

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, the guards would probably want to get a look at the eclipse! Haha

[-] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When else could the cartels cross the region under cover of darkness? It's not something that happens every night.

[-] nrezcm@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah I know right? Joe Biden should have done more to stop the eclipse!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Oh I so fucking called that when I found out that the path of totality went straight through Eagle Pass.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm just assuming, probably correctly. I don't bother with that nonsense. But yes is a safe answer since everything's a freaking conspiracy with that bunch of nutjobs.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Neither do I, I just saw a headline the other day.

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It was rapture when the path of this eclipse crossed the path of the eclipse two years ago. I think it was somewhere in Missouri/Iliinois. If you ascended, congrats. I get to go to work tomorrow.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

nope. still here.

So. Did we finally get rid of the jackasses?

[-] GTKashi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Safe to assume that if the rapture was real, most people thinking they were righteous enough to get raptured are most certainly missing their religion's arbitrary mark, so us decent, upstanding heathens would end up stuck with most of them here anyway.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oh well. It was a nice thought anyway.

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago

I'm also still here, so...

Oh, you meant the other kind of jackass.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

well... I meant the religious fruitcake variety.

I assume if a rapture did happen... it'd be all over the news. and uh, celebrations.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

wasn’t there some sort of weird Q-Anon conspiracies surrounding ~~the eclipse~~ everything that ever happens?

The answer is yes.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
391 points (92.0% liked)

News

28534 readers
3364 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS