view the rest of the comments
news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
Depends on what Iran's goal was.
If it was causing destruction and death, then a failure.
If it was to show Isn'trael that Iran has the capability to launch a coordinated drone/missile barrage deep into their territory and accurately hit specific targets (in this case military targets), no matter the Iron Dome or other missile/drone interceptors, then it was a success.
On another note, it probably cost Isn'trael a whole lot more money to attempt to intercept the drone/missiles than it cost Iran in drones/missiles.
Would you agree with the notion that Iran's attack was designed to be repelled? That's what I've seen on liberal media and r*ddit. They also believe that it was a showcase attack to save face.
Designed to be repelled? Not how I would phrase it.
Measured response.
There's probably a bunch of "racist against middle-easterners" types who were expecting either nothing but angry words from Iran, small scale terror attacks against civilians/soft targets or even a massive military strike against civilian targets. These folks didn't get what they wanted. What they watched was a massive coordinated bombardment launched with a high degree of accuracy from 2,300km away that required pretty much ALL of Israel's air defenses to be engaged, to the point that other western forces also had to send up interceptors to help them.
That's a good assessment and what I've come to believe as well.