41
submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

2 trillion dollars for a plane that can't fly in rain.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

2 trillion dollars for a plane that can’t fly in rain.

What kind of sorcery is this, we ask again?

The engineers must have been high on something strong,

To create a flying machine so horribly wrong!

[-] SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

You know how we all found out that Boeing had dry rotted from the inside because the 737 Max started falling apart? Whose to say that Lockheed hasn't gone through exactly the same shit, but we just barely get glimpses of it through the smoke of classified documents.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I would bet this is precisely the case because exact same selection pressures apply.

[-] tartan@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

“But we can’t possibly implement universal healthcare, how would we pay for it?”

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

You’d think that the F-35 Lightning II, being a Lightning-type Pokémon, could survive lighting attacks.

[-] Thordros@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but it's flying / electric, so it still takes full damage from both water and electric moves. And if the weather is sleet, it's basically game over.

this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
41 points (95.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8316 readers
297 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS