71
submitted 6 months ago by nekandro@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago

and if you think China's material and process controls are as rigorous as someone like Boeing or Airbus, it isn't

Source? You can probably point to specific processes that are done better in the US/Europe. But which ones are preventing China from building a reliable plane?

[-] Cap@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We tested Comac parts for FAA certification. When you've tested parts for decades you can pretty much nail down the cause of the failure be it design, process, materials, a combination and so forth.

Also the c919 is only certified in China. It can't fly in the US or Europe.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Nothing but time. So long as their testing is rigorous, they will catch up to Boeing... But will they be rigorous? History has repeatedly suggested, no.

But we in the west shouldn't count on that continually being the case.

this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
71 points (96.1% liked)

World News

32327 readers
735 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS