500
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Time magazine called the ex-president’s plans ‘an imperial presidency that would reshape America and its role in the world’

Donald Trump has warned that Joe Biden and his family could face multiple criminal prosecutions once he leaves office unless the US supreme court awards Trump immunity in his own legal battles with the criminal justice system.

In a sweeping interview with Time magazine, Trump painted a startling picture of his second term, from how he would wield the justice department to hinting he may let states monitor pregnant women to enforce abortion laws.

Trump made the threat against the Biden family in an interview with Eric Cortellessa of Time, in which he shared the outlines of what the magazine called “an imperial presidency that would reshape America and its role in the world”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago

Sure thing, just like he locked Clinton up. Why does anyone believe the stupid shit this idiot says?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago

It's different now though. He didn't have the power to lock her up. This time around, he'll have Project 2025 behind him to allow him to do things like that.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 years ago

He also didn't have an actual legal case, despite a LOT of digging.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

He still doesn't have an actual legal case against the Bindens either, despite a LOT of Russian support trying to falsify something.

[-] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

He won't need any. Can just "trump" up some charges (pun not intended). He'll be a dictator, it won't matter. He could shoot them on 5th Ave. and no one would say a thing

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Stop with the nonsense that Convicted Sex Offender Treason Trump has already completely enshitified the country. It wouldn't work because (1) the judge would throw out the case, and (2) no grand jury would vote to proceed. That is why Bill Barr refused Treason Trump's order to prosecute Hillary Clinton.

Trump has already tried this and failed.

[-] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Bill Barr wasn't AG for another 2.5 years before trump let off Clinton.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I kind of always assumed that there were some skeletons in Hillary's closet, but if Trump's AGs didn't even find anything that warranted an investigation...

[-] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

He's the exact same impotent blowhard. Not even his cronies will change that. He'll lose interest the minute he's elected, just like with Clinton.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

He might lose interest. His handlers might not. You need to read about Project 2025. It's what happens if Trump wins.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

He’ll lose interest the minute he’s elected, just like with Clinton.

That's not what happened. He directly ordered Bill Barr to prosecute Clinton and Bill Barr refused knowing there was no grounds. Convicted Sex Offender Treason Trump doesn't have the power to do this. He literally tried already tried and failed.

[-] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Here's an article where Conway says trump won't prosecute Clinton from November 2016, few days after the election: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38069585.amp

Bill Barr entered office as trump's AG in February 2019: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Barr

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago

The guy literally tried to overturn an election he lost. It wouldn't surprise me if it's just bluster, but at the same time it also wouldn't surprise me that he is trying to become a tyrant.

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago

Absolutely. As long as he keeps throwing these batshit fascist ideas out there, eventually one or more will gain traction and actually happen.

[-] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Being a tyrant takes energy he just doesn't have. He's a tired old man desperately trying to get elected to get out of his legal troubles.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

The guy built his entire platform off fooling idiots.

Why would he change now?

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

If his base was capable of critical thinking they wouldn't be his base. This is exactly the kind of shit they line up for at rallies to hear.

[-] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

There were still sane people in his administration to keep him in lineish, if he gets in again they will all be loyal to Trump, not the USA

this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
500 points (95.8% liked)

News

35714 readers
677 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS