121
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
121 points (97.6% liked)
News
23332 readers
1415 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
As a software engineer this is fascinating. Like, how would QC / QA have ever tested for this?
I mean, example, folding phones, it's easy to just design a system that opens and closes it over and over. Samsung even has a butt sitting on testing device.
But testing whether the motion of a vehicle negatively impacts a wiring harness in some spot on the vehicle over time to cause this sounds rough. Again, though, I'm not in hardware jobs like these so maybe it's actually easily caught?
There's a thing called HALT/HASS. HALT stands for highly accelerated life testing. Basically you put a product under extreme stress and try to find the failure points and mitigate them. Temperature, vibration (simulated or track), humidty, power cycles, ... That said I've never seen one find everything. You can also do FMEAs, which again never find everything. In short this stuff is hard even for companies that presumably have lots of experience to draw on. Don't know if Ford did something dumb to miss this or it was just one of those, "oops we missed it" that happens.
I would think that any loose wiring harness, especially somewhere it could touch another part, would be reflexively corrected by the designer. But I don't know what the part and its surroundings actually look like.
You'd think so but harnesses being cut and cutting other things is pretty common. Ford had a f150 version with a v6 that has plastic valve covers that the harness went over that eventually cut through the valve cover.
I dunno, I think my angle of attack might be to not make the parking brake, which is also meant to be usable as an emergency brake in the case of hydraulic failure, fucking electronic.
Cable actuated parking brakes have served mankind perfectly well for over 100 years. I get that innovation needs to happen over time, but the whole electronic parking brake phenomenon I think is really a case of pushing in the wrong direction. It's needless complexity for the sake of needless complexity.
When competence is in play, a wire harness chafe issue is something that should be fairly readily accounted for in the design phase, I think. I'm not entirely sure an entire-truck-vibrator to snout out harness chafes is really necessary, but it's probably something that a company as large as Ford could build if they really felt like it. It could have been any wire in any harness, potentially, causing no end of superficially mysterious issues.