92

Almost 80% of the respondents, all from the authoritative Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), foresee at least 2.5C of global heating above preindustrial levels, while almost half anticipate at least 3C (5.4F). Only 6% thought the internationally agreed 1.5C (2.7F) limit will be met.

“I think we are headed for major societal disruption within the next five years,” said Gretta Pecl, at the University of Tasmania. “[Authorities] will be overwhelmed by extreme event after extreme event, food production will be disrupted. I could not feel greater despair over the future.”

"The world’s response to date is reprehensible – we live in an age of fools.”

Lisa Schipper, at University of Bonn in Germany, said: “My only source of hope is the fact that, as an educator, I can see the next generation being so smart and understanding the politics.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] asg101@hexbear.net 35 points 6 months ago

Finally, a little more honesty. Anyone who understands the dynamics knew 1.5C was a joke.

[-] egg1918@hexbear.net 32 points 6 months ago

I was under the impression that 1.5C would be the best case scenario if we somehow stopped emitting carbon overnight. We really are fucked aren't we?

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 22 points 6 months ago

More like if we stopped emitting carbon 10-15 years ago. We're extremely fucked. But, on the other hand, this is going to put immense pressure on the world"s empires so maybe there's opportunity too.

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

1.5C was optimistically possible if the entire planet had pivoted to International Climate Stalinism immediately after the report was published.

[-] CommunistBear@hexbear.net 11 points 6 months ago

tfw no climate Stalin sadness-abysmal

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 12 points 6 months ago

I was under the impression that 1.5C would be the best case scenario if we somehow stopped emitting carbon overnight. We really are fucked aren't we?

That's been the way I've understood it; because as it stands the greenhouse being produced this year has not started to take effect yet.

[-] Adkml@hexbear.net 13 points 6 months ago

Most scientists have said for years that we didn't have a hope of staying under 1.5 just that that's what we would have to do to not have massive negative repurcussions.

this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
92 points (100.0% liked)

Earth

12861 readers
96 users here now

The world’s #1 planet!

A community for the discussion of the environment, climate change, ecology, sustainability, nature, and pictures of cute wild animals.

Socialism is the only path out of the global ecological crisis.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS