1273
Polyamorule (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 6 months ago by Gork@lemm.ee to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Gonna need to be a full on poly commune at this rate if prices keep going up.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] captainjaneway@lemmy.world 141 points 6 months ago

We're getting closer and closer to wrapping back around and just having community. Just remove the sex aspect and boom you got a community going.

[-] match@pawb.social 108 points 6 months ago

you ever wonder if communities typically did just have a bunch of sex but revisionism happened

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 93 points 6 months ago

For most of the existence of human species (according to the scholarly consensus of anthropologists) we existed in bands of adults who would intermingle freely. Adolescent men would raid nearby tribes and kidnap their young women, which is the means by which genes were exchanged between tribes.

All the monogamy and licensing happened after agriculture and the great leap forward once tribes became big enough that infectious diseases were no longer contained through pure isolation. We see the misogynistic trends rise in late Hellenic periods and then Christianity cranked it up to eleven, so now we imagine even our migrant hunter-gatherer ancestors paired off.

As a note, during the middle ages, it was super important among aristocracy to assure ladies-in-waiting were virginal before they were wed, and then used purely as heir machines, but the serf class routinely banged like bunnies in springtime. And while frowned upon by the more piety-minded clergy, it was generally ignored because a) Child mortality was something awful and every kid that ever reached majority was to be celebrated, and b) The labor shortage was extreme everywhere. There was always way too much stuff to be done, and so every pair of hands was welcome, even when they were attacked to an idiot, a malformed hunchback, a ne'er-do-well or the bastard progeny of a mixed coupling.

Curiously, as we see in the birth of Mordred, pre-Christian European traditions included suspending adultery limitations during holidays, which happened at least once a season, sometimes twice. So even in societies where monogamy was the norm, there was a defined space for getting a bit on the side. (Useful when your partner was infertile.)

So yeah. Right in one.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 21 points 6 months ago

Thank you, for being the expert when we needed one.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 months ago

You're welcome to what I know, though I'm just someone who's read more than a little pop-science. I'm not accredited or anything.

[-] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

even when they were attacked to an idiot, a malformed hunchback, a ne'er-do-well or the bastard progeny of a mixed coupling.

The serfs probably become more fit than the nobility over time because they had far more evolutionary pressure and diversity. The bloodline rules limited the nobility more than anything. One capable person doesn't change much genetically in the grand scheme of things. Nepotism and inequality are anti-meritocratic.

[-] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Royal families are just so sad and pathetic. Ultimately, everyone is worse off, even them.

[-] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Adolescent men would raid nearby tribes and kidnap their young women, which is the means by which genes were exchanged between tribes.

We see the misogynistic trends rise in late Hellenic periods

hmmm

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 months ago

Yeah, adolescence is weird, and some of this is guessing based on other primates. Gorillas, for example, evict familiar adolescent females shortly after puberty while welcoming strange adolescent females, which informs how we model the behavior of pre-agriculture migratory human tribes.

(I should add we don't presume that it was the same everywhere either, so it's quite possible that some prehistorical humans had different means of managing their teens than sending the boys off to wage war and letting the girls get kidnapped in kind by raiders. Once we go that far back, we have to rely on archeological data, which is very selective in the tales it tells.)

So then, there are some powerful goddesses in early Hellenism, for instance, Aphrodite (commonly a goddess of love and beauty), evolved from Astarte (Lover, Healer, Hunter, Warrior) who developed from Ishtar. In fact, when Aphrodite emerged from the sea foam on Kytherian beaches, Phoenician traders were coming to the Kytherian harbors, not only bringing goods and their own goddess, Astarte but also the modern Greek alphabet (before which the locals were using Linear B). So we have a path from Ishtar and this major poly-faceted goddess being reduced to a love goddess, who is then married to Hephaestus (the crippled forge) to put her in her place.

Also curious to me is Dread Persephone who ruled the dead and the underworld long before Hades appears on scene. (Poseidon was the Olympian in Chief, and we see part of his gig in creating biodiversity, not just all the creatures of the sea, but also those of the land). Zeus and Hades were added late in the game, and the stories we have of Persephone, specifically of the abduction of Persephone from Demeter and the thing with the six pomegranate seeds comes from a single poem. Even then, winter comes not because Persephone is gone, but because Demeter is sad about it, and stops doing her job. So Persephone's role is to be mom's co-dependent emotional-support assistant during springtime, and go back to attending the dead.

So here we have two examples of powerful goddesses that influenced the Hellenic people and culture who are then shoved backstage with the addition of Zeus and Hades.

There's a similar event that I remember from Snow Crash by Neil Stephenson regarding Asherah, the consort to Adonai / Elohim / Yahweh. Asherah was always the ambitious one between the two, and the Canaanite temples to her were bigger and more numerous than the ones to Adonai. Eventually an ideological rift developed and the Hebrews raided all the Asheran temples, massacring the acolytes and burning them to the ground. The whole don't boil a calf in the milk of its mother thing (which informs the separation of meat products and milk products in kosher diet) is a specific reference to an Asheran ritual meal, I think for weddings, but I'm not sure.

While I can't speak to whether misogyny is innate, I can say we've had periods in which goddesses were accepted alongside gods and in some cases were on top of the pantheon. We don't talk much about Gaea anymore even though in Hellenism she created everything on earth long before Poseidon was tinkering with horses. I think there's a division between Dionysian culture and Apollonian culture which parallels the shift from chthonic religion to celestial religion. (Chthonic gods are not to be confused with Cthonian gods, who are 20th century, and definitely celestial).

I can say that in the middle ages and the domination of Christianity, women were completely unpersoned and regarded as chattel beasts (despite their capacity to think and talk, both of which was discouraged). Even Mary, mother of Jesus was not even given due recognition until the 12th century.

[-] Shialac@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Is there a Community on Lemmy about stuff like this?

I followed a bunch of History/Archeology-Related subreddits to lurk out of interest, but didn't find anything good here on Lemmy

[-] captainjaneway@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Source for the whole kidnapping aspect?

[-] match@pawb.social 4 points 6 months ago

The Roman historian Livy writing around 0 AD attests to "the rape of the Sabine Women", wherein the founders of Rome kidnapped and raped women from surrounding villages, which may just be mythological but is likely a factor in this concept being so prevalent.

As a constrast, though, Madagascar was settled by a mix of Bantu and Indonesian (Austronesian) people, and genetic analysis suggests a founding group of at least 30 women from Indonesia, who almost certainly weren't stolen from across the Indian Ocean.

[-] anonymous111@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

This is a great write up.

Do you have any books/sources to recommend on this subject?

I've always been interested in klans persisting in the Middle East but dying out in Europe due (I'm told) to the Catholic church.

Any interesting sources would be greatly appreciated!

[-] Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 6 months ago

I'd guess they did, but I have no way to prove it. Let's build some and find out.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

but revisionism happened

The spotless translation of countless scrolls, tablets, and old books make this clear. They were all just roommates. Nothing to see here.

[-] CptEnder@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/sgfQ9o2-9BM?si=OZcIhaOCm_vOCusT

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] JDubbleu@programming.dev 9 points 6 months ago

This is incredibly common in SF. Many people live in co-ops and it's created an entire subculture where they coordinate large parties and events both within the co-op and with other co-ops. It's gone beyond necessity and become preferred by some because they enjoy living with lots of others. Not my thing, but many friends live in co-ops and love it.

[-] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 months ago

Maybe the treasure was the community we formed as we had all the sex.

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago

This is like half the point of polyamory

this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
1273 points (100.0% liked)

196

16501 readers
3293 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS