92
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
92 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13547 readers
578 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Trotsky was literally the only major bolshevik figure who wasn't at some point an active detriment to getting shit done in 1917, and I am including Lenin. Trotsky's "wrecker" tendencies came after Lenins brain exploded. Until then he was just annoying.
Note that Trotsky was also not great in 1917. All the coolest bolsheviks on 1917 were the unnamed bolshevik soldiers who kept demanding more revolution and dunking on nerds saying it was anti communist to do a revolution
He was a detriment, ex. with the Red Army he made the mistake of not pushing fully into the caucasus after the crippled enemies, instead he moved his army and went and attacked somewhere completely different and left the army to regroup
Read The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union
I dont think individual battlefield decision is the road you want to go down for comparing Trotsky with other Bolsheviks. In fact doing so with his military record at all is silly.
Read... Well, literally any book about the October revolution and the Russian civil war. Just pick up any random one.
Edit:To rephrase. I was talking about 1917 before. Changing the subjct to the civil war in general isn't going to make anyone look good. The whole affair was filled with stupid decisions by every high ranking bolshevik and if we go through them nobody is going to come out looking even remotely competent, but Trotsky is probably the one that ends up looking least bad. SPECIFICALLY FOR THE CIVIL WAR.
I'm sorry, I misread your comment. I should have paid more attention.