260
submitted 6 months ago by Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 71 points 6 months ago

So basically American cars are 2x overpriced rn

[-] MagneticFusion@lemm.ee 50 points 6 months ago

more like chinese cars were manufactured with child labor with well below average work conditions

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 86 points 6 months ago

And lots and lots of government subsidies.

[-] stembolts@programming.dev 57 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yea, it's the subsidies. The government of China funds questionably profitable companies such that they can sell their products at what would be a loss by any other company, undermining the values of competition in Europe/States.

What does China get out of it? Chinese products distributed globally running Chinese software and sensors which are beholden to the whims of the Chinese Government. They also get to weaken the economies of the target countries.

The United States does similar things with intelligence, but citizens of that country can at least condemn, research, and publish findings against it's own government. What can a Chinese citizen do? Very little except obey.

The United States is also massively flawed when it comes to competition but at least there are theoretical methods for the citizens of that country to change things. If they can destroy the corporate plutocracy currently strangling democracy.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago

Communist country figures out how to exploit capitalism better than capitalist country, how poetic.

[-] 3volver@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

China isn't a communist country, it's a totalitarian country.

Characterized by a government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control. Totalitarianism is a political system and a form of government that prohibits opposition political parties, disregards and outlaws the political claims of individual and group opposition to the state, and controls the public sphere and the private sphere of society.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism

Communism is defined as:

political and economic doctrine that aims to replace private property and a profit-based economy with public ownership and communal control of at least the major means of production (e.g., mines, mills, and factories) and the natural resources of a society.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

[-] stembolts@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Being an open country has upsides and downsides certainly. The same could be said for Russia/China's information war exploiting freedom of speech on those not educated in critical thought.

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago

As if the US doesn't also subsidize and funnel money into specific companies/industries for questionable reasons.

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Did you read their whole comment? They addressed that and pointed it out several times themselves.

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

All they said is that you are allowed to call it out. Whoopdeedoo. Still happens.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Every car manufacturer receives massive subsidies no matter where they are located.

This is oil money, nothing more, nothing less.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 27 points 6 months ago

You might want to look at some of the loosening child labor laws here in the US. Hyundai's plants have been caught several times using child labor.

I'm not defending China's practices by any means because many are truly horrific but the US is pretty far from perfect in many states.

[-] MagneticFusion@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

I have actually heard about that and it is very unfortunate. But it is still no match for having Uyghur Muslims in concentration camps and using them as forceful labor (just like how the nazis did with the Jews). Both are horrible, but one is clearly much darker and more disgusing than the other allowing them to make them even cheaper, on top of thr already mentioned chinese government subsidies.

[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, at least the US uses only their own prisoners as slave labor.

[-] xep@kbin.social -1 points 6 months ago

What-aboutism is amazing, isn't it? There's a response for everything.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

A direct comparison in a direct comparison conversation is not a whataboutism.

[-] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf 8 points 6 months ago
[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Child labour? Care to back up that claim?

[-] schizoidman@lemmy.ml -2 points 6 months ago

Do provide a source that shows Chinese cars are made with child labour.

[-] juicy@lemmy.today 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yes, and it's poor Americans who need a vehicle to buy groceries and get to work everyday who are getting shafted while the automakers rake in the profits. Not to mention the environmental costs of driving on fossil fuels.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Maybe we should get our politicians to invest in, say, mass transit. Seems pretty obvious

[-] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Why would they do that when they get bribes from automakers.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social -2 points 6 months ago

Allowing China to sell these vehicles here at well below cost is only going to shaft poor Americans even further. They're trying to do what Walmart does to small-town economies.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

You give a great example because the US has no problem with shafting poor Americans if it's American companies (i.e. big donors to American politicians) doing the shafting. At least we'd get affordable vehicles from these Chinese companies. Meanwhile the complacent American auto companies have engorged themselves on profits from overpriced vehicles, announcing record-breaking profits, and refusing to reduce prices even when supply chain issues have been worked out. This is after American auto companies sat around with their thumbs up their asses, dragging their heels on developing electric vehicles, and even working against the development of them. Now they're claiming that demand for EVs isn't actually all that great, but for some reason they're afraid of Chinese EVs (probably because the Chinese are giving customers what they actually want -- affordable practical EVs).

These leeches needed to be bailed out and they will forever need to be bailed out because instead of running a business that gives people what they want, they just do whatever can extract the most money out of people while squandering the profits on stock buybacks and fat bonuses for their executives. They're considered too big to fail, but really they're too big to exist.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 6 months ago

You can make up dastardly schemes to explain the prices all you want but this isn't borne out in reality. The bigger EV manufacturers here, outside of Tesla, aren't even American companies, they're South Korean and European and they're all selling their vehicles for similar prices to American companies. Tesla seems to be doing pretty well with sales, which means plenty of people are willing to pay these prices.

Additionally, apart from Tesla, there are only two American auto companies, GM and Ford, so I don't know why you think they're controlling the entire auto industry in the US.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

If I'm just making things up, then why are car prices so damn high and car companies are posting record profits? Tesla is only doing fine because it was the first big EV manufacturer to market and it's riding on that momentum. People willing to go with the least worst option available doesn't mean the option isn't bad. If it was a good option, then the ones offering those options wouldn't be afraid of the competition. Tesla cancelled development of a $25k model shortly before these tariffs would be announced. This is not a mere coincidence. They know that there is high demand for cheap EVs, but auto companies here much prefer fatter profit margins and the government is all too happy to protect those fatter profit margins.

Chinese companies focused on development of better and cheaper batteries and the result is that they're able to offer much cheaper EVs. Why should that be punished while the other car companies get rewarded for dragging their heels on EVs due to their comfort in selling petrol cars?

[-] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago

Chinese EV companies are rather profitable, with BYD making billions of yuan profit last year. On the other hand, Rivian is losing, what was it, just about $40,000 per car?

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago

And that profit is coming straight from the government as there is no way they're making billions in profit by selling brand new cars for $10k in 2024. There is zero margin there.

[-] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They have cars from $10k to $200+k. BYD includes a bunch of brands, including the Yangwang brand which builds the $150k U8 and the $230k U9. Not to mention their busses which are used around the world.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago

Cool but I don't see how that's relevant to the discussion of them trying to sell $10k EVs in the US.

Nobody here is arguing to buy a $230,000 Chinese EV.

[-] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They wouldn’t only sell $10k vehicles, and they wouldn’t only target the bottom of the market. If their actions in other countries are to be repeated, they wouldn’t sell $10k vehicles in the US, because the market isn’t nearly as competitive. It’s very likely, given the prices they’re charging elsewhere, that the lowest prices we’d see for a BYD would be $20k.

BYD currently makes ~$1,500 per vehicle, compared to Ford at $3,000, and Tesla at $5,300/vehicle. They’re lower margin, certainly, but they’re not just dumping cars at bargain bin prices.

US manufacturers received 4x the subsidy that Chinese manufacturers did last year. If anyone is trying to artificially manipulate the market, it’s the place that’s blockading their competitors vehicles while pumping dozens of billions of dollars into them every year.

You would be the person complaining about Japanese cars in the 80s, to be honest, and if we listened to them, we’d all still be getting 12mpg driving V6 and V8 2 ton monstrosities that break down every 5000 miles. Many of us still do, the F-150 is the most popular car in the US after all, but the rest of us at least have the option to get high mileage, high reliability vehicles.

[-] 5in1k@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

I’m not working in the conditions the Chinese have decided is ok. They can be poor and live in barracks at factories, I like free time and money.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

So youre saying American cars dont import any parts? They dont preassemble overseas? Everything is 100% made by american Union labor?

this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
260 points (96.8% liked)

News

23388 readers
1842 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS