191
Trying to shame a group of people for simply existing is actually just vile and resentful hate and not a part of "civil debate"? Who woulda thunk it?
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
191 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13556 readers
851 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Does she not realize that she's acting exactly like the Dursleys she mocked before?
From what I remember of the later books, it seems like her primary problem with the Dursleys just became that they were fat.
Sean (the skull) has an unnecessarily long video where he goes through everything that sucks about Harry Potter basically
And yes, after listening to his extended list of examples it's hard to conclude otherwise.
There's a lot of stuff in those books that flew under the radar 20+years ago when I was reading them
Ugh, I guess that explains why Draco Malfoy was redeemed at the last minute. He was essentially one of the Dursleys, but it was okay because he was written to be conventionally attractive.
Sort of off-topic, but all of this reminds me of the time the UK media raised a stink about rightoids being called "gammons".
sitting down to an exciting game of backremoved
I was talking about how JKR is now with my Mom (who literally read a couple of the books out loud to me as a kid and we even went to the Deathly Hallows midnight release together) and she said JKR is like the Dursleys now.