117
submitted 6 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] within_epsilon@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

Why would anyone choose to rent provided an option to own and sufficient funds? Who owns new construction? If landlords, why not manufacture scarcity to drive up prices?

[-] Smk@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

If you only work at a temporary place for example. You don't want to bother caring for a house. You want to be able to move whenever you like. You can't afford a loan or you can't get one. You cannot guaranty that you will work in the near future.

A mortgage is something that will lock you down to a place. Buying a plac is also something that lock you down. You wanna move to another town for a new job ? Sell the house, buy a new one. That sucks. It's faster to just rent for a while then maybe buy something after.

[-] within_epsilon@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

I know it has been a bit. Renting makes sense in the case you mentioned. Needing to buy and sell property is a hassle. Landlords are a necessity for short term housing under the current economic model.

A future economic model could be use based. Housing is yours while you use it. The housing is available for someone else when you move on.

this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
117 points (95.3% liked)

Canada

7230 readers
391 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS