164
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 69 points 5 months ago

I blame IDF for sending dogs there.

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 45 points 5 months ago

I blame the IDF for existing

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 43 points 5 months ago

It is not the resistance's responsibility to preserve the canine shields the IDF hides behind.

[-] KoboldKomrade@hexbear.net 37 points 5 months ago

One of the Ledditors called it "innocent". I love dogs. Most dogs are innocent. Police/Military dogs are abused to the point where they are incredibly violent.

[-] SoyViking@hexbear.net 26 points 5 months ago

There are probably IOF stormtroopers out there who are "innocent" and haven't done any violence yet. That doesn't make them any less legitimate targets for the resistance.

Being innocent or not has nothing to do with war. It is not a judicial process. You neutralise enemy combattants without investigating their individual motivations and actions first.

this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
164 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13524 readers
964 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS