35
submitted 5 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lightfire228@pawb.social -1 points 5 months ago

We should have more "source available, but you still need to pay for it" licenses

Best of both worlds, the company still gets to sell a product, and we can inspect the source, or even submit PR's (and maybe get a little kickback (but that's pie in the sky))

Granted, it's super easy to remove the license restrictions with the source available

[-] zingo@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

That's what donations are for.

Also, many opensource services can be selfhosted for free, while the company/developer gets they payment via donations and/or charging a support service fee to enterprises/people.

That and exposure to the homelab community which in turn can lead to future implementation in enterprise.

[-] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago

Best of both worlds

Only in term of security/privacy. Not control and freedom. And without freedom to modify, share and reuse software we are in a straight path to the lack of privacy again.

[-] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

This was just an idea, I don't understand why the downvotes. Just counter if you don't agree.

[-] Lightfire228@pawb.social 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The downvotes aren't surprising; it's not a very popular idea

I still think it's an idea worth exploring, though

Businesses won't support Linux if they can't sell something, and it gives us access to the code

[-] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah, the downvotes are unsurprising, but at least I don't see a reason to downvote on an idea unless it is inherently an intentional insupt or something along those line.

I don't think your idea is the best, but it is an idea, and that alone makes it worth exploring, as you mentioned. My disagreement with your idea comes precisely by your point. There are plenty of people that do not move away from Windows or Mac precisely because the software they "need" is not available. If these companies made their software available on some Linux distros, there's a very good chance some of their "hostages" will still pay for them. DaVinci resolve is good example of this.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
35 points (83.0% liked)

Privacy

32130 readers
953 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS