346
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

GTA 3 has a silent protagonist and most of the dialogue takes place in mission cutscenes. It’s a very simplistic game in comparison to GTA 4.

If you’re after a grounded experience with characters that feel real, then yes it paid off.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

There were also two full GTA games between GTA III and IV. Vice City and San Andreas both built on the successes of the previous games and built out the universe of characters and locations. I'd be curious to see the script lengths for those, too, but the differences might not be that dramatic.

[-] Granixo@feddit.cl 3 points 1 year ago

Somebody didn't play the Stories games.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I did not. Were they really full games?

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah with graphics quality somewhere between PS1 and PS2 and smaller maps, but decently fleshed out stories nonetheless. I believe all or at least most of them were designed for PSP. I did Liberty City stories, it was fun for the time 🤷‍♂️

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

and smaller maps

Vice City was the same size, Im pretty sure LC was as well, they're just edited versions

[-] Granixo@feddit.cl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They were at San Andreas level of graphics really (exept maybe animations).

And while the story in LCS is pretty lackluster, at least the game was still fun and introduced online multiplayer.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago
[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 8 points 1 year ago
[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago
[-] Kondeeka@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

He also showed up as Catalina's boyfriend in San Andreas, and didn't say a thing.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's bothered me: why didn't they have an easter egg or something for gta online where you can play that character? Like hello?! Rockstar when you're done being stupid, call me.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

yeah thats gta3 alright

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I was thinking more which had the better gameplay. All else is fluff around that IMO.
Diablo II for instance had very minor story and dialogue, but is an all time classic.

[-] li10@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

Why you asking if the larger script made the gameplay better 😆

It depends what you want from a game. It’s okay to like a game primarily for story or primarily gameplay, both are valid.

GTA IV had both, but imo its gameplay is a little bit dated these days. I know people still love the gameplay loop in GTA V, but personally I’m basically done with it.

[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 4 points 1 year ago

Depends on what you consider good game. GTA 3 is more arcadey in a way. GTA 4 is more immersive. They’re very different.

this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
346 points (97.8% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21174 readers
23 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS