271
Irrational (mander.xyz)
submitted 5 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That’s not what Planck length is. It’s the minimum resolvable accuracy not measurement. Meaning we can’t prove something was somewhere specific beyond the Planck length. Not that it’s the building size of the universe.

https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length#:~:text=It%20is%20about%201.616255,Planck%20length%20per%20Planck%20time.

it is a common misconception that it is the inherent “pixel size” or smallest possible length of the universe.[1] If a length smaller than this is used in any measurement, then it has a chance of being wrong due to quantum uncertainty

[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

That is actually good to know, it answers a lot of questions I've had about the universe.

this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
271 points (90.0% liked)

Science Memes

11189 readers
1727 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz