98
submitted 5 months ago by naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago

ACs are not being provided to reduce emissions. Most teams seem to be respecting this decision.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

No, it's just posturing. The emissions from AC at the Olympic Village would have zero impact on climate change. This is just green washing for public perception points.

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

The emissions saved from removing a few hundred ACs are negligible. But the message it sends to the millions watching the Olympics is significant. Which, again, is why I am hoping there will be at least some symbolic action against rule-breakers - it will start a conversation about the need to regulate / ban ACs.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

As far as I can tell, there is no rule to break here.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Lol that's bullshit, someone fucked up to save a dime and they're trying spin it

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

First of all, [citation needed]. Second, even if it is, a good message is being sent.

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
98 points (97.1% liked)

World News

32359 readers
305 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS