817
I just cited myself. (mander.xyz)
submitted 6 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
239 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 6 months ago

That’s not an axiom or definition, it’s a consequence of the axioms that define arithmetic and can therefore be proven.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works -4 points 6 months ago

There are versions of math where that isn't true, with infinitesimals that are not equal to zero. So I think it is an axium rather than a provable conclusion.

[-] JackRiddle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

Those versions have different axioms from which different things can be proven, but we don't define 9.9 repeating as 1

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

That's not what "axiom" means

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
817 points (95.2% liked)

Science Memes

11437 readers
1249 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz