61
Is pixel 4a too old for a new phone?
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
61 points (93.0% liked)
Privacy
32177 readers
618 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
What's the controversy?
They claim their security measures are better then other custom ROMs.
Don't they all make that claim?
Do they all really? I know GrapheneOS does, and I think DivestOS even says "use my OS to stay as up to date as possible, but if you have a current/supported Pixel, use GrapheneOS instead for superior security." But I don't recall other OSes really going "we're more secure than GrapheneOS and here's why."
Hence the controversy! ๐
Also, Graphene tend to act superior about it and it pisses people off.
That doesnt sound like a controversy, its bascially "btw, I use arch"
https://www.privacyguides.org/en/android/
There is no controversy. There's a lot of people memeing. I haven't seen a single security analysis, or survey of options, that didn't put GOS at the very top. Look at privacy guides, they say graphene is great, but if you can't use that divest is okay.
People may not like the leader, and the developers are very opinionated which turns other people off, but I don't think there's any questioning the pedigree and the level of security provided
Yes I agree. The product itself seems to be very good indeed. The problem people have is not with the product, but with the personality of the project leader. Personally I have used GrapheneOS for the past 3 months on a Pixel 7 Pro and I love it. My reason for choosing GrapheneOS was that I need a phone with a top quality camera, and I want a phone that is less than 3 years old. That alone sets GrapheneOS apart from many other projects as many only support older phones with low to mid range cameras. Then you have the privacy, security, and setting customization that graphene offers and it's a clear top choice for me. Even if the leader is arrogant as some say, his product is good, and exactly what I need at the moment. So with no other projects offering what is important to me, I choose graphene for 2024. It's solid.
I'm honestly not quite sure, I just know people are getting riled up when it's mentioned.
It gets people going, (Daniel) 'Mkay?
I stole this from another lemmy comment, please don't come after me
Who's comment was that ๐
Can't really remember right now. I think it was a thread on which phone to buy and people were talking about graphene os on pixels.
Someone commented something along the lines of "m'lady" but with Daniel Micay's name as a pun