109

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by RNAi@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

NSFW 26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

Ackshually, there is no nudity in this photo, it is only an artist's depiction of something that is clearly fictive.

No birds were exploited in the making of this. How could it be immoral?

[-] RNAi@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

libertarian-alert

[-] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 months ago

But what if the ballsy bird can consent?

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago

look, I didn't follow the struggle session close enough to make a good follow-up joke about it, okay?

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024

109 points (96.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13541 readers

879 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS