202
submitted 11 months ago by schizoidman@lemmy.ml to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Why is competition for US auto makers a bad thing ?

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 47 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because "free markets, competition, being voluntary" are propaganda by capitalists using their owned media and purchased government to make its victims double as its defenders.

The goal of market capitalism is to end competition often by buying out up and coming rivals to kill the threat, manipulate the markets to your advantage using anything from bribery to cost benefit analysis of potential consequences/fines for sociopathic actions to potential profits, and conspire with your economic sector to coerce the workers you need into accepting less.

This is just expanded indentured servitude with a marketing team.

[-] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

Because we don't like free markets. We like the illusion of choice, but the security of monopoly.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Thats a new spin to me. The only thing monopolies secure is their own existence.

[-] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago

I do believe that is what they meant

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 months ago

This isn't competition, it sounds like the CCP heavily subsidises the manufacture, in an attempt to kill the American industry off.

Thinking in decades or centuries is a very powerful tool!

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

This isn’t competition, it sounds like the CCP heavily subsidises the manufacture

China: "Here, have a bunch of cheap electric vehicles to replace your aging fleet of ICE engines. Don't worry, we're picking up a part of the tab."

Americans: "What a great deal! We'll buy them in droves."

State Government: "Not so fast! This wouldn't be fair to honest, hard working domestic car companies like Tesla and Volvo and Toyota."

Thinking in decades or centuries is a very powerful tool!

Shame we're only capable of thinking about the next quarter's profits.

[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

The US subsidizes their EV industry twice as much as China. The real why China can do this is because the US has gutted their industrial base in favor of financialization while China built up their industrial base.

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works -2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, sure - that's still China trying to undercut and ensure the US remains reliant on them long term...

[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

No that's just the US not being competitive because stock buy backs and layoffs are easier than building good cheap cars.

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

...or both. Think about it, if what you've said is completely true (I don't disagree, BTW), why would they bother subsidising?

They're trying to ring fence the market. That the US is helping then is only vaguely related

[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

But it's not both. How can you produce something for cheaper with less subsidies unless your just better at it.

It's like saying the winner of a race had an unfair advantage even after giving their opponent a head start.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

On top of the other things people are saying, I guarantee that the U.S. automakers will do a "China will take your jobs" thing if this happens.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because they’d send them there… to save a buck.

Or rather a whole lot of bucks.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Because the US is an authoritarian pseudo democracy being run by cartels. And free market and capitalism is a death sentence for them.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

It’s hilarious to me that you neglect to mention that the Chinese government is heavily subsidizing the vehicles specifically to undermine other automakers.

Not that the US are the good guys here, but this is just more of the trade war crap between China and basically everyone else.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

And a 7500$ rebate isn't a subsidy?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

It is. it's a bit different in context though.

but the OC was trying to paint China as being innocent victims. which they are far from.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Oh yeah, that's hilarious. China is not an innocent actor here.

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
202 points (92.8% liked)

News

29605 readers
2333 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS