The role of attrition against mainstream platforms (Discussion) (lemmy.ml)

submitted 4 months ago by whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mainstream platforms such as Meta and X have accumulated a near-universal audience that is the root of all their evil. From sentiment analysis mass experiments to propagandistic political advertising. Things are worse in third countries where they are even less moderated. So I was thinking that as long as FOSS/Privacy is just geeky and elitist they just keep doing business as usual, from enshitification to fascism. Additionally, people have moved their political posting, scheduling, discussion online, so this gives them more power. Like seeing anarchist groups on Facebook is cringe, but some insist that "that is where the mass is, perhaps we move to Instagram to get to more Zedders". Whaaaat? Questions: What tactics could be used to move people en masse away from mainstream platforms, and more generally, do you think there is a point in it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What tactics could be used to move people en masse away from mainstream platforms

Propaganda, advertising and other kinds of informing about the issues of the mainstream platforms.

and more generally, do you think there is a point in it?

Yes. Not just because of privacy issues but also because the algorithm is made to filter what a user can see (making their source of information heavily biased and incomplete) and to addict them to the platform (this shouldn't be the main argument because people don't really care about it now but it can be a nice secondary one).

[-] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

this shouldn’t be the main argument because people don’t really care about it now but it can be a nice secondary one

I do think that recommendation algorithms are a big culprit for the widespread scrolling addiction epidemic. Smart phones and social media platforms have positioned the population in readiness to consume ads and propaganda. So, I think this is definitely among the main arguments.

Plus note people were arguably repulsed when it was leaked that Facebook performed a sentiment analysis psychological experiment on them.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Imo when you advertise (or anti-advertise) something, every argument matters but it's important to structure the arguments well. It should be done by a skilled person that knows how to do it.

[-] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Agreed. This area of skills completely evades me though. So, yes, if you have some tips on that, they will be well received.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Nah I'm just an average elitist Arch user.

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024

25 points (90.3% liked)

Privacy

32103 readers

672 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS