539
submitted 4 months ago by Silverseren@fedia.io to c/news@lemmy.world

A BBC investigation reveals that Microsoft is permanently banning Palestinians in the U.S. and other countries who use Skype to call relatives in Gaza.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kitnaht@lemmy.world 80 points 4 months ago

That's what you get for trusting Microsoft with anything...or Google...or Apple...or Facebook... stop tying your communication to these companies, they can pull the rug at any time.

[-] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 66 points 4 months ago

You have to trust someone with these communications, there is no free communication beyond face to face

[-] mlaga97@lemmy.mlaga97.space 32 points 4 months ago

Matrix (federated) or Briar (multi-modal P2P) are both good options for getting rid of dependency on central organizations.

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

Still need an ISP. ISPs are pretty centralized and monolithic for lots of people.

[-] Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

I'll just build my own cell tower and become my own ISP, checkmate

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

It won't be too useful unless you peer with the others.

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

That sounds just meshtastic.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

You're assuming that people in Gaza have consistent access to the internet. The beauty of Skype is that you can call a landline through it.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Unless you build your own, you have to trust your ISP to move packets, but you don't have to rely on any third party services or give them your personal info to use social media.

Fully decentralized, open-source, and encrypted social networks exist. The only servers needed are your computer and the computers of the friends you communicate with. (See: Retroshare )

They're just never going to get big because small, personal friend-to-friend networks can't compete with the network effects of centralized media and a never-ending torrent of dopamine on tap.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

From my comment above:

You're assuming that people in Gaza have consistent access to the internet. The beauty of Skype is that you can call a landline through it.

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[-] knightly@pawb.social 3 points 4 months ago

Whoops, somehow managed to typo it. Fixed now.

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

trust yourself by hosting a matrix server

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

How do you call a landline number in a war zone through a matrix server?

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I was simply responding to the comment:

You have to trust someone with these communications, there is no free communication beyond face to face

the oh-so-clever smart alecks saying "whaddabout ISPs????" forgot about 2-way radio and meshnets

[-] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago
[-] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 4 months ago

Signal is centrally hosted thus it's proverbial rug can be pulled.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

Wait until you find out about internet service providers

[-] knightly@pawb.social 14 points 4 months ago

You can have more than one dumb pipe to push bits through, but if the ISP can read your network traffic then you have bigger problems than a single-point-of-failure.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Do you have more than one ISP?

[-] knightly@pawb.social 5 points 4 months ago

I'm very lucky in that regard. Not only do we have a local ISP and mobile service from a national carrier, but the electric co-op that provides our power just ran 2.5Gb/s fiber through the neighborhood and lets members use 200Mb/s on it for free.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

For the most part the ISP doesn't have a way to know you are using VoIP to contact people in a particular country (unless you are using a VoIP service owned by the ISP of course).

[-] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

True. Yet another linchpin.

Edit: spelling.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[-] sunzu@kbin.run 2 points 4 months ago

Threema is what signal should have been.

But I ain't got in me to start forcing people again lol

Signal it is until it is proven untrustworthy

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah, they’re both good (still).

features Threema Signal
price $5 / 5€ Free
account creation phone number optional phone number required
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago
[-] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

They didn't fuck up, they made a design choice about the scope of the app. Are they also fucking up by not blurring the messages on screen? After all someone could be looking over your shoulder without you realizing it. Maybe Signal should ship with spyglasses.

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 7 points 4 months ago

You're absolutely right and it's insane I keep coming across these wild takes from people that clearly don't understand technology

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

I'm not sure why you think anyone would want a messenger that touts itself for its encryption to not encrypt things.

[-] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago

It does encrpyt messages: In transit, exactly as advertised. Holy fuck.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 3 points 4 months ago

Damn that's bad, and Signal's response was even worse. They knew about it in 2018, for 6 years.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run -1 points 4 months ago

I always felt like signal is there more to satisfy a niche so people feel like their whatsapp is good enough.

Leadership makes some odd chocies IMHO

Wasn't Elon Musk trying to push Telegram?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

That wouldn't shock me, but he was right that Signal was not addressing a known vulnerability. In fact, denying that it even was a vulnerability.

For what it's worth, I trust Telegram even less than Signal. And at least Signal seems to be finally doing something about the problem.

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 7 points 4 months ago

Not true at all lol, have you heard of peer-to-peer?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

This is what net neutrality and anti-trust laws are for.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

You can run your own infrastructure.

Matrix has been recommended, but you can run your own Synapse server and federate with other servers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] odium@programming.dev 14 points 4 months ago

Your average person doesn't know of any communication method other than mega corps.

[-] Thedogspaw@midwest.social 8 points 4 months ago

Yor right I will just use my billions of dollars to build a global internet infrastructure and make my posts on my own phone using the os I just built in my spare time for fun its not about trust its about necessity

[-] Gamoc@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

That's what you get

You're right, they deserve this. You asshole.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 4 months ago

We had an issue a couple days ago where we couldn't move a VIP to a new phone because the vendor wanted us to perform multi-factor auth via a device from two years ago. We had to roll back the service. Our entire lives are built atop fragile digital infrastructure with broken and poorly thought-out policies.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
539 points (96.4% liked)

News

23424 readers
1546 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS