539
submitted 4 months ago by Silverseren@fedia.io to c/news@lemmy.world

A BBC investigation reveals that Microsoft is permanently banning Palestinians in the U.S. and other countries who use Skype to call relatives in Gaza.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 66 points 4 months ago

You have to trust someone with these communications, there is no free communication beyond face to face

[-] mlaga97@lemmy.mlaga97.space 32 points 4 months ago

Matrix (federated) or Briar (multi-modal P2P) are both good options for getting rid of dependency on central organizations.

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

Still need an ISP. ISPs are pretty centralized and monolithic for lots of people.

[-] Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

I'll just build my own cell tower and become my own ISP, checkmate

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

It won't be too useful unless you peer with the others.

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

That sounds just meshtastic.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

You're assuming that people in Gaza have consistent access to the internet. The beauty of Skype is that you can call a landline through it.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Unless you build your own, you have to trust your ISP to move packets, but you don't have to rely on any third party services or give them your personal info to use social media.

Fully decentralized, open-source, and encrypted social networks exist. The only servers needed are your computer and the computers of the friends you communicate with. (See: Retroshare )

They're just never going to get big because small, personal friend-to-friend networks can't compete with the network effects of centralized media and a never-ending torrent of dopamine on tap.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

From my comment above:

You're assuming that people in Gaza have consistent access to the internet. The beauty of Skype is that you can call a landline through it.

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[-] knightly@pawb.social 3 points 4 months ago

Whoops, somehow managed to typo it. Fixed now.

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

trust yourself by hosting a matrix server

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

How do you call a landline number in a war zone through a matrix server?

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I was simply responding to the comment:

You have to trust someone with these communications, there is no free communication beyond face to face

the oh-so-clever smart alecks saying "whaddabout ISPs????" forgot about 2-way radio and meshnets

[-] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago
[-] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 4 months ago

Signal is centrally hosted thus it's proverbial rug can be pulled.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

Wait until you find out about internet service providers

[-] knightly@pawb.social 14 points 4 months ago

You can have more than one dumb pipe to push bits through, but if the ISP can read your network traffic then you have bigger problems than a single-point-of-failure.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Do you have more than one ISP?

[-] knightly@pawb.social 5 points 4 months ago

I'm very lucky in that regard. Not only do we have a local ISP and mobile service from a national carrier, but the electric co-op that provides our power just ran 2.5Gb/s fiber through the neighborhood and lets members use 200Mb/s on it for free.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[-] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

True. Yet another linchpin.

Edit: spelling.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

For the most part the ISP doesn't have a way to know you are using VoIP to contact people in a particular country (unless you are using a VoIP service owned by the ISP of course).

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[-] sunzu@kbin.run 2 points 4 months ago

Threema is what signal should have been.

But I ain't got in me to start forcing people again lol

Signal it is until it is proven untrustworthy

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah, they’re both good (still).

features Threema Signal
price $5 / 5€ Free
account creation phone number optional phone number required
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago
[-] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

They didn't fuck up, they made a design choice about the scope of the app. Are they also fucking up by not blurring the messages on screen? After all someone could be looking over your shoulder without you realizing it. Maybe Signal should ship with spyglasses.

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 7 points 4 months ago

You're absolutely right and it's insane I keep coming across these wild takes from people that clearly don't understand technology

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

I'm not sure why you think anyone would want a messenger that touts itself for its encryption to not encrypt things.

[-] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago

It does encrpyt messages: In transit, exactly as advertised. Holy fuck.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago

Then it's weird they are fixing it now. Why aren't they insisting this doesn't need to be dealt with because it was a feature, not a bug?

[-] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

It's weird that apps sometimes change scope and add features that users want? Ones that contributers already did most of the work for?

Why aren’t they insisting this doesn’t need to be dealt with because it was a feature, not a bug?

That was literally what they have been saying this whole fucking time.

"The database key was never intended to be a secret. At-rest encryption is not something that Signal Desktop is currently trying to provide or has ever claimed to provide," responded the Signal employee.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Did they make an intentional design choice which users should have been okay with like you said the first time or is this a feature users wanted? It can't be both.

[-] subignition@fedia.io 1 points 4 months ago

It's really fucking annoying how relentlessly you pick fights with people these days. Wish you'd chill out dude.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Or I'm just speaking my mind and you don't agree.

And aren't you picking as fight with me right now?

[-] subignition@fedia.io 1 points 4 months ago

Not picking a fight; don't really care what you have to say in response. Just needed to share my observation that you are latching onto people in a really aggressive manner in multiple threads as of late. If that doesn't bother you then go ahead and disregard.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 0 points 4 months ago

You are right to bringing up this issue and it is pretty fucking big deal inho mistakes happen but signal "leadership" has made series of questionable choice which don't quite align with the user base.

Other person is down playing it hard too. Hard to tell why as he is not really providing any good reason besides trying to "explain" it away

Wasn't Elon Musk trying to push Telegram?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

That wouldn't shock me, but he was right that Signal was not addressing a known vulnerability. In fact, denying that it even was a vulnerability.

For what it's worth, I trust Telegram even less than Signal. And at least Signal seems to be finally doing something about the problem.

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 3 points 4 months ago

Damn that's bad, and Signal's response was even worse. They knew about it in 2018, for 6 years.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run -1 points 4 months ago

I always felt like signal is there more to satisfy a niche so people feel like their whatsapp is good enough.

Leadership makes some odd chocies IMHO

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 7 points 4 months ago

Not true at all lol, have you heard of peer-to-peer?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

This is what net neutrality and anti-trust laws are for.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

You can run your own infrastructure.

Matrix has been recommended, but you can run your own Synapse server and federate with other servers.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago

This is exactly what they want you to believe.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
539 points (96.4% liked)

News

23406 readers
2391 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS