393

The Democratic Socialists of America pulled its endorsement of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York this week, accusing the progressive congresswoman of being insufficiently supportive of the Palestinian cause and efforts to end the war in Gaza..

Her approach has increasingly strained her relationship with some of the left’s most strident critics of Israel. When she rallied last month in the Bronx with Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Jamaal Bowman, dozens of pro-Palestinian demonstrators angry over her endorsement of Mr. Biden chanted “You’re a fraud, A.O.C.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 88 points 3 months ago

left wing is so busy ripping itself apart while right has fully consolidated, good luck winning elections. This is practically handing POTUS45 his POTUS47 title. US left wing always picks wrong timing to settle internal scores which is why it's always flatfooted and toothless.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, no, THIS time handing over power to fascists will DEFINITELY make the left in this country strong.

/s since that's literally what's being said by these fucking people who go on about how the ~~national rebirth~~ 'reconstruction' of the political environment under a Trump regime is how we get progressive victories.

[-] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 3 months ago

The communist leader in Germany before Hitler took over said that failure of the nazi government would help convince people to vote for communism in the next election; he was subsequently killed in a concentration camp.

[-] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 18 points 3 months ago

I mean he was basically right. The social democrats took 30% and the Nazis got 0% in the next election

In 1949 after Germany's defeat in WWII.

[-] idunnololz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago
[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

If only they'd joined the SPD in voting for Hindenburg, the guy who won the election and appointed Hitler chancellor, then Hindenburg would've... won the election and appointed Hitler chancellor.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Just reading about it:

Critics believed that the KPD's sectarianism scuttled any possibility of a united front with the SPD against the rising power of the Nazis.

Not sure if it is analogous to America, since the KPD in Weimar Germany was more prominent politically than the DSA is in America. It was definitely a bad position in hindsight.

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Wasn't it the SPD that appointed Hitler Chancellor? Sounds like in hindsight, they were right.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
[-] Vittelius@feddit.de 1 points 3 months ago

And Hindenburg wasn't the candidate of the SPD. He was the candidate of a coalition of parties (the Reichsblock) spearheaded by the openly antidemocratic conservative-liberal German Peoples Party (DVP).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1925_German_presidential_election

[-] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

like in definition of insanity: making the same mistake over and over expecting different outcomes? Yeah by that definition US left is insane.

[-] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

In reality I have never encountered people who strictly define themselves as “leftist”, “liberal”, “progressive”, “socialist”, “democratic socialist”, “communist”, “center-left”, “moderate left”, etc.

seems like an attempt to drive wedges. Remember: We are all for a viable candidate that advances those issues even partially, versus the polar opposite.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Remember: We are all for a viable candidate that advances those issues even partially, versus the polar opposite.

Not all of us, unfortunately.

[-] comfy@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

while right has fully consolidated

Well, apart from the literal assassination attempt.............

The right has so much infighting that it's dirty to even call them 'the right' as if it's a single group. If the US weren't using a FPTP system with the threat of vote spoiling, it would be much clearer just how split all political factions really are. Neo-Nazis have been calling Trump "Zion Don" for the past ten years and crying about all his links to da jooz and blags, the Libertarians disagree so much that about 2 million of them voted their own party instead of Rep or Dem in 2020. There's even PACs like the Lincoln Project.

The reason it's important to recognize this is that it's important to know their weaknesses. They're not all one homogeneous group, and many of them literally want to kill each other.

[-] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

fighting or not they have all lined up behind POTUS45 even if previously they criticized him etc. At the time when left is dilly-dallying and builds up "resistance centers". Look, all the pro-Gazan declarations with conditional support for Biden is a waste of air as as soon as POTUS45 will grab his POTUS47 title it's game over and they will have no recourse, and more likely than not public protests will get slowly outlawed. Look North of the border for examples of how it's done (Alberta, Canada)... so no matter what they do nothing is going to change now the only differentiator is that Biden may listen whereas POTUS45 absolutely will not.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It’s much more difficult to build something than it is to tear it down.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

That's why we should have Ranked Choice voting. people could give their preference a chance, while still counting their vote against those they don't want in office.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee -2 points 3 months ago

It's because they always get angry and start pointing fingers when things get tough.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
393 points (87.4% liked)

politics

19132 readers
4045 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS