1249
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago

Only if the ranking is applied at the state level AND the national level. I'm not going to throw away my vote or my delegate's vote.

[-] stickyShift@midwest.social 49 points 2 years ago

Why not get rid of delegates altogether while we're at it?

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

Yes please. As someone who isn't in a swing state, I would like my vote to matter.

And a popular vote means citizens in other countries could vote (Puerto Rico).

Also, prisoners should get a vote.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And a popular vote means citizens in other countries could vote (Puerto Rico).

I just want to point out that Puerto Rico is not a separate country, it is part of the United States. The people there are US Citizens just like those in the 50 States. However, as a territory they do not have the same representation in government or federal support as a full State.

A lot of people get this wrong. Including some Border Patrol officers. They don't exactly hire the most educated for the Frontline positions, that's pretty clear from the stupid clearly wrong or illegal shit CBP ends up doing.

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Thank you. I meant to say other territories (hence citizens), since they don't get a vote. But yeah, a lot of people don't realize they are part of the U.S.

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Bro, a quarter of the Borer Patrol *are" Puerto Ricans.

[-] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

So PR is a colony

[-] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Isn't ranked choice like straight up banned in like 12 states or something? You'd have to flip each of those states first before even going down that road right?

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Well, theoretically federal law would supercede state law. But current SCOTUS is kinda wack right now.

[-] xionzui@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

Doesn’t the constitution explicitly grant states the right to decide how they hold their elections?

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 9 points 2 years ago

The Constitution is so vague on the point, it doesn't even require that states hold elections. It just says that the legislature decides how the state's presidential electors are appointed. That didn't stop the Originalists on the Best Supreme Court Money Can Buy™ from ruling in the Colorado ballot case that, well, akshually, legislatures aren't allowed to decide how to run their state's elections.

Now, you'd think that a ruling that federal law supersedes state control of elections means that federal law supersedes state control of elections, but that principle may only apply to who appears on the ballot. It may only apply to whether their guy appears on the ballot. Don't pin down the Best Supreme Court Money Can Buy™, man! They need to know who's going to benefit from ranked-choice voting before they know what the Constitution actually says. Hell, the Constitution may actually contain a list of which states are allowed to have ranked-choice voting, and which are not. We just don't know yet!

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
1249 points (99.1% liked)

News

36366 readers
878 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS