186
submitted 2 years ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Archive link

A California police department wants to be the first agency to have a law enforcement-branded Cybertruck, according to an internal email obtained by 404 Media.

The email Sergeant Jacob Gallacher, of the Anaheim Police Department, sent in early February read “P.S. I spoke with the Chief yesterday and we still want to be the first police agency to have a Cybertruck. If anyone can make that happen, I know it is you!” Gallacher sent the email to James Hedland from UP.FIT, a company that sells modified Teslas for use by law enforcement. The email was part of a conversation about the department’s use of Teslas.

Gallacher later told 404 Media that the email was something of “a joke,” but reaffirmed the agency’s wish to obtain a Cybertruck before other agencies, even if more for “community engagement” than using it as a patrol vehicle.

“We would, but it’s not necessarily from a patrol perspective,” Gallacher said. 404 Media obtained the email through a public records request.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Fast acceleration and low fuel use might be desirable characteristics for a police vehicle, but that seems like a kind of pricey vehicle to be used in a role that one expects wear-and-tear in.

thinks

Sometimes police need to sit in their car idle for a long time. If the traction battery in the Cybertruck can be used to drive accessories (like, if there's an inverter or something driven by the traction battery), that might be useful. My understanding is that a number of EVs don't permit for that, though.

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The Cybertruck explicitly advertises its 120/240vac inverter for 'job site tools' and other similar uses; then voids your warranty if you actually use it 'while stationary'.

Here's Louis Rossmann ranting about it for a bit.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The Cybertruck explicitly advertises its 120/240vac inverter for ‘job site tools’ and other similar uses

Oh, that's nice.

then voids your warranty if you actually use it ‘while stationary’.

That's not.

Hmm. I wonder if it's because adding extra charge/discharge cycles eats into battery life, which is probably a major bound on the car's life.

considers

Honestly, if EVs don't have a way to read charge/discharge count in a way that's hard-for-potential-resellers-to-fiddle-with the way odometers are, they probably should, and EV sales should probably list that number the way cars do mileage today, as a measurement of "wear".

EDIT: And at least for the battery, the warranty should probably be on the number of charge/discharge cycles, not on the distance traveled.

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Oh, most definitely. Tracking battery wear should 100% be standard practice, and considered when buying/selling used EVs.

I just find it interesting that Tesla tells you to do something, then ultimately punishes you for doing so.

If you're not supposed/allowed to use it as a stationary power station; don't advertise that use case as a selling point.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I'm honestly asking- what would a practical non-stationary use for such a thing be?

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

The only thing that came to mind is charging cordless tool batteries between job sites. Most other things you'd want mobile usually has a 12v alternative, if not being explicitly designed for travel.

It really is a stupid limitation, and I'm mostly sure it's there just as an excuse to not payout warranty claims.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
186 points (93.5% liked)

News

37764 readers
421 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS