1604
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Soup@lemmy.world 211 points 4 months ago

It would be an awful lot easier than trying to salvage Biden’s image as it stands. If they do it right this should be super easy, but if they drag their heels on the changes necessary then it might be a lot harder.

This is BIG opportunity to rebrand and show what really matters to the party.

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 82 points 4 months ago

This is the perfect opportunity to do that! But I have absolutely zero faith in them actually doing that.

But maybe I’ve become jaded in my age with politics. Maybe they won’t just choose the worst possible option.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago

Maybe they won’t just choose the worst possible option.

Her turn 2.0 watch out yall here comes Hillary! /$

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

Lol seriously.

Also “Her Turn” as a campaign slogan was so bad.

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 2 points 4 months ago

I think the fact that the party was willing to do this says a lot. They've already avoided the worst possible option, I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 4 months ago

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/johnson-replacing-biden-ticket-wrong-unlawful/story?id=112129063

I'm sure it will all work out when Republicans contest the new candidate... Fuck me what is this idiocy.

[-] Fisk400@feddit.nu 31 points 4 months ago

Are they going to force Biden to run against his will or what is the plan here? If Biden dies, are Democrats not allowed to run at all because they aren't allowed to replace him.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 4 months ago

are Democrats not allowed to run at all because they aren’t allowed to replace him.

Bingo.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah this was the point all along

[-] Nurgle@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

Dems haven’t even officially nominated anyone yet, dont think the republicans would get very far with that stunt

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Who’s going to stop them? The Supreme Court?

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 months ago

If you think they're that off the rails then they don't need this as a premise to challenge Democrats in the first place.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

The thing is, it’s not the Democratic Party replacing Biden anymore. Biden has willfully stepped down, and given his support to Harris. To put it another way, Biden is no longer “being replaced”.

But, that may not matter in the long run. The question now is when/if Republicans take this to court, and whether or not the judge decides to hear the case or not and how long that will take.

As far as I know, judges have historically decided not to pursue a case if it would impede the election process (e.g., gerrymandered district ruled illegal, but still used because not enough time to redraw maps). I would like to hope that the Democratic Party gets the same curtsy in this case.

However, I feel that right now given the current political climate, and the current way judges have been deciding in favor of the Republican agenda, this may not be the case and the new candidate will be tied up in legal tape to be able to campaign properly. The Republicans will cease upon this opportunity and use it against the Democratic Party to make them look weak and unable to do anything they say they will do. And to be honest, they won’t be wrong.

Democrats are their own worst enemy, and their hubris will be to all of our detriment.

https://youtu.be/-lm0Cy8gwvk

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

You can tell it’s a good move when the GOP starts pulling this shit.

[-] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago

from the article

Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is "no credence" to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet -- the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

[-] Tujio@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Booo the DNC just made an unprecedented pivot which the people actually wanted.

[-] RinseDrizzle@midwest.social 5 points 4 months ago

Nervously optimistic, but I've been hurt before

It's not going to be perfect. It's not going to even inspire people for the next 4 years. What it will do is get us to January where we, hopefully can rightfully calibrate like we should have in 2020. No matter the winner, THIS DOES NOT END IN NOVEMEBER. Remember that.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah it was going to be impossible to properly move forward from this. There would be too much media coverage and division and lingering questions.

Now though, we have a real opportunity to unify, and make several arguments to voters -- Democrats listened and picked a younger candidate. We can also flip the script on candidate age now

[-] 5redie8@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Was Bidens image really that bad outside of these internet circles?

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 4 months ago
[-] DeanFogg@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Well Rs certainly hated his guts for totally real reasons

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Have you met the DNC?

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
1604 points (99.3% liked)

News

23388 readers
1792 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS