21
submitted 1 month ago by KhanCipher@hexbear.net to c/games@hexbear.net

Imagine using this energy for actually productive change, over being angry that you're being slightly inconvenienced.

Pretty much what happened is it wasn't advertised that you would need an epic games account to play the multiplayer, and people are angry about it for some reason. Likely because it's Epic, not because they had to make an account, though knowing Gamers they probably would be pissed about about having to make an account outside of steam too.

And it's funny because the one discord server I usually hang out on that has pretty chuddy people on it largely had a reaction of "Sure it sucks, but there's a lot bigger fish to fry in the games industry."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] goose@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

Ubisoft is awful about this. My kids couldn't play Immortals on Xbox because it required a Ubisoft account to even play singleplayer, but they're too young to make accounts, so they got stuck in an endless loop until we figured out to set the entire system in offline mode. Why is this a thing? Who does it help?

[-] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

They get to point to registered accounts in quarterly shareholder meetings.

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
21 points (81.8% liked)

games

20418 readers
578 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS