44
submitted 2 months ago by Emperor@feddit.uk to c/movies@lemm.ee

Joaquin Phoenix’s abrupt departure from a gay romance film has reportedly sparked “huge outrage” in Hollywood and could lead to legal action.

The Joker star was set to lead the untitled detective love story – that he had taken to director Todd Haynes in the first place – but five days before production was scheduled to begin, he made the last-minute decision to drop out of the film after getting “cold feet”, a source told Variety.

Entire sets had been built in Guadalajara, Mexico, where shooting had been due to take place. Phoenix abandoned the project in early July just days before the scheduled shoot, leaving cast and crew in the lurch.

Now, reports are emerging that legal action could ensue, after the decision sparked backlash from industry veterans.

“There’s been a huge amount of outrage,” one studio executive told The Hollywood Reporter. The publication cited sources suggesting the decision could lead to legal action.

...

Produced by Killer Films and backed by sales agent MK2 Film, Phoenix’s movie had already been sold to international distributors. Variety further reports that the actor’s role cannot be recast, leaving the crew out of work and investors unpaid, and meaning that losses could surpass seven figures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 56 points 2 months ago

"The actors role cannot be recast" the fuck you mean lol

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

It’s related to financing. The funding was contractually tied to having Phoenix in the role. So if they can find another actor with enough pull, maybe they can recast?

Phoenix was also a co-writer, so who knows what happens next.

You have to wonder what really went down. Also this dude is always pulling stunts for publicity so who knows.

[-] xor@infosec.pub 30 points 2 months ago

means: they plan on making more money suing him than they would with the film.

[-] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

My guess is they used his involvement to sell it to distributors. It says they have already made deals for international markets, likely getting more than they would have with a different actor.

[-] li10@feddit.uk 8 points 2 months ago

I kinda get that. If they have no big name actor the movie is already dead, which is the unfortunate reality for a lot of movies these days.

Sounds like he was the guy pushing for the movie to be made in the first place as well, so maybe there’s no interest from other names to replace him.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
44 points (92.3% liked)

movies

1700 readers
208 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS