48
OK conceptually speaking? I'm into this idea
(hexbear.net)
Rules for Movies & TV Discussion
Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.
Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.
REMEMBER ENGAGING WITH THIS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY?? REMEMBER CONSUMING THIS CONTENT AS A VIDEO GAME?? CONSUME IT NOW AS VIDEO
I just thought it seemed neat.
I mean not to come at you but to get mad at the broader fact that the only media that anyone seems to want to invest in is pre-existing IP, and video games have always been the very bottom of the barrel for adaption. There's how many books or original stories out there, but Amazon paid a bunch of losers to do analytics that told them the biggest ROI on their media is by adapting Spelunky and Pac Man
Idk I just like the idea of anthology series of one off episodes for them? Its not a crossover as far as I can tell.
Yeah as far as I can tell its just an anthology of a bunch of one off episodes for each game.
I actually do not mind Multiversus at all lol but I totally understand why people do.
I agree but have two exceptions to this, Nintendo and Disney.
Like I've been into crossovers since WAY before they became saturated. Like I came up with an "Omniverse" comic book universe with just... everything fictional in it when i was in like early highschool. And ive used the same basic concept for wrestling companies (multiple), dueling companies along the line of wrestling but with actual fights that are to the death, jrpgs, fighting games, ect. Ive always been into the idea.
The only thing about Multiversus that sucks for me is that its based on what company owns the IP.
Right yeah meant to mention the monetization.
I'm ngl though I must have some sort of disconnect in my brain because Iron Giant is a very emotionally important movie to me and I totally get the idea of how its bad to put him in a fightin game, but I dont mind seeing him in a fighting game? Just one of those random autismdragon disconnects where I dont get whats upsetting people (there are a few too many of those and I am broken).
Yeah I saw. I was half responding to their thoughts with what I said. I totally get and technically agree that its bad for corporate reasons I just dont emotionally connect.
Yeah I saw this one too (I watch most of their videos) and the only thing I could really connect with was the Droogs part because the tonedeafness of that seems obvious.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: