125
EV prices need to drop by one third if Canada wants to hit sales targets, says gov't report (www.ctvnews.ca)
submitted 2 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
95 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Unless policies or technologies change, the ownership cost of electric vehicles (EVs) needs to decrease by 31 per cent if Canada to wants to reach its sales target of 60 per cent EVs by 2030, according to a new report released Thursday by Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux.

Last December, the federal government unveiled its Electric Vehicle Availability Standard that outlined zero-emission vehicle sales targets for automakers. The standard requires all new light-duty sales in Canada to be electric or plug-in hybrid by 2035. There are also interim targets of at least 20 per cent of all sales being EVs by 2026 and 60 per cent by 2030.

Those federal government targets come as growth forecasts for auto companies have plateaued and concerns about charging infrastructure persist. The price of EVs has also pushed the cars out of reach for many consumers. According to the Canadian Black Book, the average cost of an EV was $73,000 in 2023.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 months ago

Correct, but that doesn't mean we need the ones designed and manufactured in China. There are already other options designed and manufactured in better countries.

[-] yardy_sardley@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

And the ones from China still cost less after the 100% tariff

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

And that isn't suspicious to you at all?

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 months ago

What's suspicious is western car companies refusing to make small cheap EVs that consumers might actually want to buy.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

This is a huge factor. It isn't just the initial costs. A smaller EV is lighter, a simple EV is lighter, this lets it use less energy overall which ultimately means you pay less in electricity.

Smaller vehicles tend to have smaller tires, which are cheaper. Cheaper vehicles are also cheaper to insure than more expensive ones.

All these factors combined can easily be the difference between affording a new EV or having to stick in the used ICE market.

[-] nik282000@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

No, that's pretty much in line with America's oil first economy.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

I wrote this for another post but it's still relative here.

How many times have we bailed out or given loans/grants to the Big Three?

  • 1979 - Dec. 21- Chrysler receives a $1.5 billion federal loan guarantee, known as the Chrysler Loan Guarantee Act of 1979, the first big US automaker bailout. Source

  • Dec 2008 - President Bush announces a $13.4 billion emergency bailout for GM and Chrysler to be paid by mid-January 2009. (source same as above)

2018 - Liberal government writes off 2009 $1.1B US loan to Chrysler, plus interest, docs show Source

  • 2023 - Auto industry’s switch to EVs gets $12 billion in loans and grants from the US Energy Department Source

2024 - Canada's PBO estimates total corresponding government support (for EV capital and operating expenses) to be up to $52.5 billion Source

[-] jasep@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Perhaps, but since they're prohibitively expensive we aren't buying enough of them.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
125 points (98.4% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
522 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca