46

I'm 25 now. My friends are either 18-19 or 45-60 with nothing in between. It's been like this my whole life.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

I've always tended to have friends across ages, though my twenties were a bit less broad, and skewed older other than a small handful of friends from high school.

By my late twenties, it had broadened back out fairly well. But I was into stuff that tends to be all ages, and the high school friends were more spread out as they graduated, got jobs and such, so it was a few my age that I was very close with, and the rest were newer friends.

Now, it's more in clusters. I'm fifty now.

There's the group that's around my age; my best friend, some guys from my disability support group, a few exes and their spouses. All within a few years of 50.

There's a much older group that I made friends with when I was working still; mostly family of my patients. There's also two guys that were my teachers in martial arts, that I'm close to. I'd say the youngest of those is 72, the oldest being 88. The one lady may have had a birthday and be 73 now, we don't really keep track of birthdays.

There's a younger group, in their late twenties to early thirties that I met through family around that age, plus a guy that works at the closest convenience store that was just really cool.

Then there's the "kids". Some of them were students right after covid let up, but before I had a knee injury that made it difficult to give lessons, and they ended up moving on to other teachers (martial arts stuff), but still keep in touch. The rest are only kinda friends, they're more a friend group I fell into via gaming with my kid, and I'm the token old fart that doesn't mind them being kids while we game.

Youngest of those says he's 15, but I suspect he's a little younger. Oldest just graduated last year, started college this year, I wanna say she's still 18, but again, it isn't a close kind of friendship. Don't even know what most of their faces look like lol. Just voices over the internet. Good kids though, and might turn into real friends as they mature and move into life. Harder to be friends with folks that aren't adults, you have to keep distance and watch where conversations go, so there's not much depth there.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
46 points (97.9% liked)

Casual Conversation

2077 readers
313 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS