136

Link to the article

I think that China could do absolutely untold damage to the American psyche and illusion of invulnerability if it simply instantly obliterated these clowns on Taiwan from hundreds of kilometers away with a cloud of drones dense enough to block out the sun. America treats the navy seals like they are all Master Chief, when in reality they are just guys who can carry a log and swim for a long time or some shit. Maybe that matters when you’re like… raiding a compound of a guy who has been on the run for decades while he’s asleep with Neon Genesis Evangelion playing on the TV, but genuinely what are these guys going to do to actually fight back against China? China will never even let them see a single PLA soldier lmao.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] StalinStan@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago

I just saw a video where china is making a grenade launcher/sniper rifle combo. The US tried it before but decided it was too expensive. China said it wants to shoot grenades a kilometer in a light infiltry fire team.

[-] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

But seal team six guy has a big knife strapped to his chest

[-] BobDole@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

Actually it’s a shitty tomahawk and he uses it to kill a POW

[-] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago
[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

In case you don't know, the seals actually give out tomahawks to all their war criminals. Lets them do war crimes better.

[-] StalinStan@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a good place to put a high explosive round from a kilometer away

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

Chinese Communist Bolters when?

[-] StalinStan@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is pretty much that from what I saw. Just scaled down for guardsman size. Some of the rounds even had a two stage propelant system.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

I want that thing so badly.

Nato and wpact armies handled the distribution of heavy weapons differently. Idk how former wpact countries that aren't nato do things but back in the day the soviets tended to have weapons attached to smaller units while nato weapon teams were at platoon level. I have absolutely zero idea how the pla is structured.

The grenade sniper rifle is cool bc you could accurately fuck up ground robots, lightly armored and unarmored vehicles, expensive stuff, and other targets with accurate fire from much further than an infantry grenade launcher but without the weight and expense of a missile or mortar system. There are weapons like 12.7mm, 14.5mm, and 20mm rifles in the same space but they're not widely used. If the qlu-11s airburst capabilitiy actually works it'd have somewhat more utility than a conventional rifle.

[-] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

like war crime bullets or like a 40mm? and if the latter isn't that just artillery?

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

Sounds like it chambers for a Chinese 35mm greande round and there are also 40x53mm versions. Maybe for export? I'll vote for whichever fascist lifts the norinco import ban!

[-] StalinStan@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

From what I saw the export has standard 35mm. For domestic use they have 40mm with programmable range for airburst type use

[-] StalinStan@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

As I understand this is is light artillery. Placing a grenade round into a medium target or though an open window. So more precise than artillery and more splody than anti-material

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
136 points (95.3% liked)

news

24584 readers
612 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS