35
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
35 points (100.0% liked)
PC Gaming
8512 readers
766 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Frame generation is fucking huge.
Especially since it works best at high frame rates. Like, if you were playing 30fps doubling to 60 might be a perceptable difference because of how long it is in between frames.
But going from 60 to 120, it's still 50% "fake" frames, but the time between "real screens" is much smaller allowing for more frequent corrections to what the "fake" frames are predicting.
So while it won't help a bad computer run anything, it can help a "mid" computer make what it can run look a lot better, because you can crank up a bunch of options to maintain the fps you were getting without I.
I play cyberpunk 2077 at 130 fps on overdrive at 1440p and its awesome and smooth with a RTX 4070. I play on a hisense 55" tv at 11 feet on my sofa and I don't notice any artifacts. Its just way better than classic SSAO and other global illumination "hacks" that raster uses.