534
submitted 2 months ago by Linkerbaan@lemmy.world to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

The United Nations General Assembly voted 124-14 on Wednesday to strip Israel of the right to self-defense in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem.

The test of the resolution was based on the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion in July that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory was illegal.

The resolution also calls on member states not to sell arms or military equipment to Israel that would be used in Gaza, the West Bank, and east Jerusalem.

Among the 43 countries that abstained were Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom. Some 12 of the 27 European Union countries abstained, including Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Sweden.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

And nobody will obey that decision.

ICJ has made some rulings about Artsakh too. Should have been not so hard to sanction the beheading savages out of occupying a small country and expelling its residents. By the way, in the UN charter a "country" does not only refer to UN members, that distinction is intentionally made clear in a few places.

UN is less useful than Holy Roman Empire.

[-] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 months ago

I think many will obey the decision, just not the USA, Canada, terf island, the E.U., you know the usual culprits for not following international law.

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Is terf island GB?

[-] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 0 points 2 months ago

implying that other countries do follow international law

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

It’s not a decision to obey. It’s just a boring skit they put on once in a while. I feel like the kids’ Model UN has more actual impact on society than the UN and its toothless performative bullshit

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago

Legislative bodies get their "teeth" by the state monopoly on violence. The UN having teeth would have to mean UN forces, and it'd even have to mean those forces being among the strongest in the world.

It's a diplomatic tool, not anything else. It encourages communication and collaboration and discourages conflict.

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
534 points (95.3% liked)

World News

32353 readers
357 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS